Paper · 1972 · Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science

Parthenocarpic Fruit Growth and Development of the Peach as Influenced by Gibberellin Application

Isao KIYOKAWA; Shoichi NAKAGAWA

13
claims
25
verbatim quotes
8
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Induction of parthenocarpy in Japanese cultivars of the peach was demonstrated. Among several growth regulators examined, GA3 was only effective to induce parthenocarpic fruit in Okubo cultivar, when it was applied at a concentration of 500 or 1000ppm at the balloon stage. Moreover, GA3 was effective to induce parthenocarpy in 3 of the 6 cultivars tested, but had no effect on the ramaining 3 cultivars.It was also found that the percentage of parthenocarpic fruit set increased with increase in a concentration of GA3, and higher percentages of parthenocarpic fruit set were obtained in repeated applications of GA3.No effects were obtained in the growth of parthenocarpic fruit for three concentrations of GA3 when it was applied only once at the balloon stage, but pronounced effects were found in parthenocarpic fruit growth when GA3 was applied repeatedly during the early stage of fruit growth, even if it was applied at a low concentration.Fruit quality of parthenocarpic fruit induced by GA3 was almost identical to those of pollinated fruit, although fruit size and weight were smaller than the pollinated fruit.It was also shown that non-pollinated peach fruit will continue their further growth when GA3 at a concentration of 1000ppm was applied within 30 days after emasculation, but not thereafter.Morphological observations showed that there were little or no differences in mesocarp thickness between seeded and parthenocarpic fruits, although some differences in cell number and cell size were found between them. While, tissue thickness of pits and pit cavity in the parthenocarpic fruit were smaller than those of the seeded one.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among several growth regulators examined, GA3 alone induced parthenocarpic fruit in the Okubo peach cultivar at 500 or 1000ppm applied at the balloon stage.

Material
Okubo cultivare0
Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
induce parthenocarpic fruite0
Qualifier
at a concentration of 500 or 1000ppm at the balloon stagee0
Comparator
several growth regulators examinede0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Parthenocarpic Fruit Growth and Development of the Peach as Influenced by Gibberellin Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among several growth regulators examined, GA3 was only effective to induce parthenocarpic fruit in Okubo cultivar, when it was applied at a concentration of 500 or 1000ppm at the balloon stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–272 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 induced parthenocarpy in 3 of the 6 peach cultivars tested.

Material
3 of the 6 cultivars testede1
Treatment
GA3e1
Outcome
induce parthenocarpye1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Parthenocarpic Fruit Growth and Development of the Peach as Influenced by Gibberellin Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“GA3 was effective to induce parthenocarpy in 3 of the 6 cultivars tested, but had no effect on the ramaining 3 cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–404 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 had no effect on parthenocarpy in the remaining 3 peach cultivars.

Material
ramaining 3 cultivarse1
Treatment
GA3e1
Outcome
induce parthenocarpye1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Parthenocarpic Fruit Growth and Development of the Peach as Influenced by Gibberellin Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e1

“GA3 was effective to induce parthenocarpy in 3 of the 6 cultivars tested, but had no effect on the ramaining 3 cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–404 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The percentage of parthenocarpic fruit set increased with increasing GA3 concentration.

Treatment
concentration of GA3e2
Outcome
percentage of parthenocarpic fruit sete2
Direction
increasede2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Parthenocarpic Fruit Growth and Development of the Peach as Influenced by Gibberellin Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“the percentage of parthenocarpic fruit set increased with increase in a concentration of GA3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–520 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated applications of GA3 gave higher percentages of parthenocarpic fruit set in peach.

Treatment
repeated applications of GA3e2
Outcome
percentages of parthenocarpic fruit sete2
Direction
highere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Parthenocarpic Fruit Growth and Development of the Peach as Influenced by Gibberellin Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e2

“higher percentages of parthenocarpic fruit set were obtained in repeated applications of GA3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 526–618 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A single GA3 application at the balloon stage had no effect on growth of parthenocarpic fruit at three concentrations.

Treatment
GA3e3
Outcome
growth of parthenocarpic fruite3
Direction
No effectse3
Qualifier
applied only once at the balloon stagee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Parthenocarpic Fruit Growth and Development of the Peach as Influenced by Gibberellin Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e3

“No effects were obtained in the growth of parthenocarpic fruit for three concentrations of GA3 when it was applied only once at the balloon stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated GA3 applications early in fruit growth had pronounced effects on parthenocarpic fruit growth, even at a low concentration.

Treatment
applied repeatedly during the early stage of fruit growthe4
Outcome
parthenocarpic fruit growthe4
Direction
pronounced effectse4
Qualifier
even if it was applied at a low concentratione4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Parthenocarpic Fruit Growth and Development of the Peach as Influenced by Gibberellin Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e4

“pronounced effects were found in parthenocarpic fruit growth when GA3 was applied repeatedly during the early stage of fruit growth, even if it was applied at a low concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit quality of GA3-induced parthenocarpic peach fruit was almost identical to that of pollinated fruit.

Treatment
GA3e5
Outcome
Fruit qualitye5
Direction
almost identicale5
Comparator
pollinated fruite5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Parthenocarpic Fruit Growth and Development of the Peach as Influenced by Gibberellin Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fruit quality of parthenocarpic fruit induced by GA3 was almost identical to those of pollinated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1051 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3-induced parthenocarpic peach fruit was smaller in size and weight than pollinated fruit.

Treatment
GA3e5
Outcome
fruit size and weighte5
Direction
smallere5
Comparator
pollinated fruite5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Parthenocarpic Fruit Growth and Development of the Peach as Influenced by Gibberellin Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e5

“Fruit quality of parthenocarpic fruit induced by GA3 was almost identical to those of pollinated fruit, although fruit size and weight were smaller than the pollinated fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1122 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 at 1000ppm applied within 30 days after emasculation let non-pollinated peach fruit continue further growth.

Treatment
GA3 at a concentration of 1000ppme6
Outcome
further growthe6
Direction
continuee6
Qualifier
within 30 days after emasculatione6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“non-pollinated peach fruit will continue their further growth when GA3 at a concentration of 1000ppm was applied within 30 days after emasculation, but not thereafter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1146–1312 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mesocarp thickness showed little or no difference between seeded and parthenocarpic peach fruits.

Outcome
mesocarp thicknesse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Parthenocarpic Fruit Growth and Development of the Peach as Influenced by Gibberellin Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e7

“there were little or no differences in mesocarp thickness between seeded and parthenocarpic fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1450 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cell number and cell size differed to some extent between seeded and parthenocarpic peach fruits.

Outcome
cell number and cell sizee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Parthenocarpic Fruit Growth and Development of the Peach as Influenced by Gibberellin Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e7

“some differences in cell number and cell size were found between them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1530 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tissue thickness of pits and pit cavity was smaller in parthenocarpic peach fruit than in seeded fruit.

Outcome
tissue thickness of pits and pit cavitye7
Direction
smallere7
Comparator
seeded onee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Parthenocarpic Fruit Growth and Development of the Peach as Influenced by Gibberellin Application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–97 · show in text ↑
e7

“tissue thickness of pits and pit cavity in the parthenocarpic fruit were smaller than those of the seeded one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1539–1648 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Gibberellic acid · yield · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 9 positive, 4 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.