Intervention effectmodel-written summary

GA3 applied at 36 or 47 days after full bloom inhibited bud development on short shoots more than application at 0 or 12 days.

A claim from The influence of bloom thinning and GA3sprays on flower bud numbers and distribution in peach trees · 1990

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 applied at 36 or 47 days after full bloom inhibited bud development on short shoots more than application at 0 or 12 days.

Taxon
peach treesPrunus persicat0
Treatment
GA3 36 and 47 days AFBe0
Outcome
flower bud development on short shootse0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
0 or 12 days AFBe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“peach trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–99
e0

“Applications of GA3 36 and 47 days AFB inhibited flower bud development on short shoots more than when applied at 0 or 12 days AFB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 613–744

Title

The influence of bloom thinning and GA3sprays on flower bud numbers and distribution in peach trees

R. E. Byers; D. H. Carbaugh; C. N. Presley Journal of Horticultural Science 1990. doi:10.1080/00221589.1990.11516040

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-51d464465fac022e8a8f64883977547e88da2bf84befe5bddff766f3ee8d2e54 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer

Gibberellic acid · growth · Prunus persica (peach)Results differ

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.