Paper · 1984 · Agronomy Journal

Cation Composition of Tall Fescue Forage as Affected by K and Mg Fertilization1

J. W. West; J. H. Reynolds

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Grass tetany has been observed in cattle grazing cool‐season grasses during the late winter and early spring in the southeastern USA. It has been suggested that Al is involved when this problem occurs on wet sites. Tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) experiments were located at Knoxville (2 years) and Chapel Hill, Tenn. (1 year) to determine fertilizer effects on K, Mg, Ca, and Al concentrations of forage grown on soils subject to flooding. The soils were Lindside loam (fine‐silty, mixed, mesic Fluvaquentic Eutrochrepts) and Roellen silty clay loam (fine, mixed, thermic Vertic Haplaquolls). Treatments consisted of a control and fall applied Sul‐Po‐Mag (2 MgSO 4 • K 2 SO 4 ), Epsom salts (MgSO 4 • 7 H 2 O) + potassium sulfate (K 2 SO 4 ), Epsom salts alone, or potassium sulfate alone to supply 112 kg Mg and/or 181 kg K ha −1 . The forage was sampled from February through early May while these soils were usually saturated with water and at some times while there was water standing on the surface. Magnesium fertilization had little effect on forage Mg while K fertilization usually increased forage K. As growth increased, forage K increased in early spring. Equivalent ratios of K/(Ca + Mg) closely followed trends of forage K and increased potential for tetany but remained below 2.2. Magnesium concentrations remained low (< 2 g kg −1 ) in the forage through early May. Aluminum and Ca concentrations were usually unaffected by fertilization treatments. There was no apparent benefit from fertilizing these soils with Mg sources. Concentrations of Al dropped considerably when the plant growth was not close to the wet soil surface and when standing water was not present. Apparently, soil Al adhered to the leaves in contact with wet soil or standing water since Al uptake through the roots would be very limited with the soil pH about 6.0.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium fertilization had little effect on forage Mg.

Taxon
Tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
Magnesium fertilizatione2
Outcome
forage Mge2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) experiments were located at Knoxville”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“Magnesium fertilization had little effect on forage Mg while K fertilization usually increased forage K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1129 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K fertilization usually increased forage K.

Taxon
Tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
K fertilizatione2
Outcome
forage Ke2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) experiments were located at Knoxville”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“Magnesium fertilization had little effect on forage Mg while K fertilization usually increased forage K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1026–1129 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage K increased in early spring as growth increased.

Taxon
Tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Outcome
forage Ke3
Direction
increasede3
Setting
early springe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) experiments were located at Knoxville”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e3

“As growth increased, forage K increased in early spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1131–1186 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Equivalent ratios of K/(Ca + Mg) remained below 2.2.

Taxon
Tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Outcome
Equivalent ratios of K/(Ca + Mg)e4
Value
2.2e4
Qualifier
remained below 2.2e4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) experiments were located at Knoxville”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e4

“Equivalent ratios of K/(Ca + Mg) closely followed trends of forage K and increased potential for tetany but remained below 2.2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1314 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Forage Mg concentrations remained low, below 2 g kg-1, through early May.

Taxon
Tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Outcome
Magnesium concentrationse5
Value
< 2 g kg −1e5
Qualifier
through early Maye5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) experiments were located at Knoxville”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e5

“Magnesium concentrations remained low (< 2 g kg −1) in the forage through early May”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 1316–1400 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum and Ca concentrations were usually unaffected by fertilization treatments.

Taxon
Tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
fertilization treatmentse6
Outcome
Aluminum and Ca concentrationse6
Direction
no_changeinferrede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) experiments were located at Knoxville”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e6

“Aluminum and Ca concentrations were usually unaffected by fertilization treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1402–1484 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizing these soils with Mg sources gave no apparent benefit.

Taxon
Tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
fertilizing these soils with Mg sourcese7
Outcome
benefite7
Direction
no_changeinferrede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) experiments were located at Knoxville”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e7

“There was no apparent benefit from fertilizing these soils with Mg sources”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1486–1560 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Al concentrations dropped considerably when plant growth was not close to the wet soil surface and standing water was absent.

Taxon
Tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Outcome
Concentrations of Ale2
Direction
droppede2
Setting
when the plant growth was not close to the wet soil surfacee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) experiments were located at Knoxville”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“Concentrations of Al dropped considerably when the plant growth was not close to the wet soil surface and when standing water was not present”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1562–1703 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil Al appears to have adhered to leaves in contact with wet soil or standing water.

Taxon
Tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Organ / stage
leavese2
Outcome
soil Al adhered to the leavese2
Qualifier
in contact with wet soil or standing watere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Tall fescue ( Festuca arundinacea Schreb.) experiments were located at Knoxville”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 224–304 · show in text ↑
e2

“Apparently, soil Al adhered to the leaves in contact with wet soil or standing water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1705–1789 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · nutrient: content · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 20 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.