Paper · 1995 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Improvement of the growth, grain yield, and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium nutrition of grain corn through weed control

R. Gonzalez Ponce; Ma L. Salas

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
16
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the course of an experiment in Arganda del Rey (Autonomous Community of Madrid), a herbicide was tested in a grain corn field heavily infested with weeds. The herbicide, a mixture of metolachlor and atrazine, was applied when the corn had developed eight leaves. There was a great variety of weed species and their distribution in the plots depending on the climatic conditions. The control achieved with the herbicide was high, 100% in 1992 and 90.5% in 1993. Weed control improved the growth, grain yield, number of grains per ear, 1,000 grain weight, ? grain content, total uptake of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) by the plant, and ?, ? and ? translocation efficiency to the corn grain. Per 100 g/m2 of additional weed dry weight, there was a grain yield decrease of 98.2 kg/ha as well as a decrease of the total uptake of N, P, and ? of 14.6, 2.7 and 9.5 kg/ha, respectively, by the corn plant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide control of weeds was 100% in 1992.

Taxon
grain cornt0
Treatment
herbicidee0
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
highe0
Value
100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The control achieved with the herbicide was high, 100% in 1992 and 90.5% in 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain corn through weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide control of weeds was 90.5% in 1993.

Taxon
grain cornt0
Treatment
herbicidee0
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
controle0
Direction
highe0
Value
90.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The control achieved with the herbicide was high, 100% in 1992 and 90.5% in 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain corn through weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control improved corn growth, grain yield and grain number per ear.

Treatment
Weed controle0
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
growth, grain yield, number of grains per eare0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Weed control improved the growth, grain yield, number of grains per ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain corn through weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control improved 1,000 grain weight and grain content.

Treatment
Weed controle1
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
1,000 grain weight, ? grain contente0
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1,000 grain weight, ? grain content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–572 · show in text ↑
e1

“Weed control improved the growth, grain yield, number of grains per ear, 1,000 grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain corn through weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control improved plant nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake.

Treatment
Weed controle1
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
total uptake of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) by the plante0
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total uptake of nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) by the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 574–650 · show in text ↑
e1

“Weed control improved the growth, grain yield, number of grains per ear, 1,000 grain weight, ? grain content, total uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–586 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain corn through weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control improved translocation efficiency to corn grain.

Treatment
Weed controle1
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
translocation efficiencye0
Direction
improvede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“? translocation efficiency to the corn grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–709 · show in text ↑
e1

“Weed control improved the growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 464–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 112–124 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each additional 100 g/m2 of weed dry weight was associated with 98.2 kg/ha lower grain yield.

Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
98.2 kg/hae0
Qualifier
100 g/m2 of additional weed dry weighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Per 100 g/m2 of additional weed dry weight, there was a grain yield decrease of 98.2 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 711–801 · show in text ↑
t0

“grain corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–103 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each additional 100 g/m2 of weed dry weight was associated with less nitrogen uptake, listed as 14.6 in a series ending in kg/ha.

Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
total uptake of Ne0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
14.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease of the total uptake of N, P, and ? of 14.6, 2.7 and 9.5 kg/ha, respectively, by the corn plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–918 · show in text ↑
e1

“additional weed dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–753 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each additional 100 g/m2 of weed dry weight was associated with less phosphorus uptake, listed as 2.7 in a series ending in kg/ha.

Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
total uptake of N, Pe0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
2.7e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease of the total uptake of N, P, and ? of 14.6, 2.7 and 9.5 kg/ha, respectively, by the corn plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–918 · show in text ↑
e1

“additional weed dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–753 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each additional 100 g/m2 of weed dry weight was associated with 9.5 kg/ha less uptake of an illegible nutrient.

Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
total uptake of N, P, and ?e0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
9.5 kg/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease of the total uptake of N, P, and ? of 14.6, 2.7 and 9.5 kg/ha, respectively, by the corn plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 815–918 · show in text ↑
e1

“additional weed dry weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–753 · show in text ↑

herbicide · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

herbicide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

651 papers: 500 positive, 151 negative or no effect

499 papers in the same direction as this paper · 127 in the opposite direction · 24 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

647 papers more in this group

See all 651 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.