Paper · 1992 · South African Journal of Plant and Soil

Alternative rest-breaking agents to DNOC/oil for apples

M. S. North

3
claims
8
verbatim quotes
5
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Rest-breaking agents less toxic than the commercially-used DNOC/winter-oil and less expensive than hydrogen cyana- mide were tested on Golden Delicious in a high density planting in a region of warm winters. Some combinations of mineral oil and cyanamide were as effective in promoting budbreak as both DNOC/oil and cyanamide but neither treatment improved fruit set or fruit size 12 weeks after treatment, relative to the control. Rest-breaking treatments are seen as one aspect of tree manipulation rather than a direct means of increasing production.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Some mineral oil and cyanamide combinations promoted budbreak as effectively as DNOC/oil and cyanamide.

Material
Golden Deliciouse0
Treatment
mineral oil and cyanamidee1
Outcome
budbreake1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
DNOC/oil and cyanamidee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alternative rest-breaking agents to DNOC/oil for apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e0

“tested on Golden Delicious in a high density planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 125–178 · show in text ↑
e1

“Some combinations of mineral oil and cyanamide were as effective in promoting budbreak as both DNOC/oil and cyanamide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither treatment improved fruit set or fruit size 12 weeks after treatment relative to the control.

Treatment
DNOC/oil and cyanamidee1
Outcome
fruit set or fruit sizee2
Direction
improvede2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alternative rest-breaking agents to DNOC/oil for apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e1

“Some combinations of mineral oil and cyanamide were as effective in promoting budbreak as both DNOC/oil and cyanamide”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–325 · show in text ↑
e2

“but neither treatment improved fruit set or fruit size 12 weeks after treatment, relative to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 326–430 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Rest-breaking treatments are one aspect of tree manipulation rather than a direct means of increasing production.

Outcome
a direct means of increasing productione3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Alternative rest-breaking agents to DNOC/oil for apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–55 · show in text ↑
e3

“Rest-breaking treatments are seen as one aspect of tree manipulation rather than a direct means of increasing production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–552 · show in text ↑

cyanamide · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

cyanamide · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.