Paper · 2014 · Agronomy Journal

Selecting Cover Crop Mulches for Organic Rotational No‐Till Systems in Manitoba, Canada

Caroline Halde; Robert H. Gulden; Martin H. Entz

7
claims
10
verbatim quotes
46
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In western Canada, limited research has been conducted on reduced‐tillage grain production systems managed organically. The objective was to select cover crop mulches for an organic rotational no‐till system in Manitoba. A 2‐yr field study (2010–2011, and repeated 2011–2012) was conducted in Carman, MB, Canada. In the cover crop year, 10 different combinations of cover crop species were seeded in the spring, in pure stand or in mixtures, and rolled using a roller‐crimper in mid‐summer, at the flowering stage. These rolled mulches were then left on the soil surface over the fall and winter. The following spring, spring wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) was seeded directly into these mulches (no‐till). Mulches with hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth) showed the most promising results. Cover crop treatments with vetch had the highest mulch biomass in September of the cover crop year (9.1–10.7 Mg ha −1 ), and in the following spring (6.0–7.6 Mg ha −1 ) and provided the best weed control. In late fall of the cover crop year, N content of mulches with vetch reached high levels (308 kg N ha −1 on average), and high amounts of N (93–164 kg N ha −1 ) were released from these mulches over winter. Organic spring wheat no‐till planted into mulches with vetch produced yields comparable to regional conventional average yields. Mulches with vetch used in an organic rotational no‐till system reduced the need for tillage for a period of 1.5 to 2 yr without affecting yields of organic spring wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch cover crop treatments had September mulch biomass of 9.1–10.7 Mg ha −1.

Taxon
vetche0
Outcome
mulch biomasse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.1–10.7 Mg ha −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Cover crop treatments with vetch had the highest mulch biomass in September of the cover crop year (9.1–10.7 Mg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–907 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch mulch biomass was 6.0–7.6 Mg ha −1 the following spring.

Taxon
vetche1
Outcome
mulch biomasse1
Value
6.0–7.6 Mg ha −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“in the following spring (6.0–7.6 Mg ha −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 913–956 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cover crop treatments with vetch had the highest mulch biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–850 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch mulches provided the best weed control.

Taxon
vetche0
Treatment
Mulches with hairy vetche0
Outcome
weed controle1
Direction
beste1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Mulches with hairy vetch ( Vicia villosa Roth) showed the most promising results.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–787 · show in text ↑
e1

“provided the best weed control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–992 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch mulch N content averaged 308 kg N ha −1 in late fall.

Taxon
vetche0
Outcome
N content of mulchese0
Direction
high levelse0
Value
308 kg N ha −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“In late fall of the cover crop year, N content of mulches with vetch reached high levels (308 kg N ha −1 on average)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1109 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch mulches released 93–164 kg N ha −1 over winter.

Taxon
vetche1
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
releasede0
Value
93–164 kg N ha −1e0

Verbatim

e0

“high amounts of N (93–164 kg N ha −1 ) were released from these mulches over winter.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1115–1199 · show in text ↑
e1

“N content of mulches with vetch reached high levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic no-till spring wheat in vetch mulch yielded comparably to regional conventional averages.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
no‐till planted into mulches with vetche0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
comparablee0
Comparator
regional conventional average yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic spring wheat no‐till planted into mulches with vetch produced yields comparable to regional conventional average yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1328 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vetch mulch reduced tillage need for 1.5 to 2 yr without affecting wheat yields.

Taxon
spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Mulches with vetche0
Outcome
need for tillagee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
1.5 to 2 yre0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulches with vetch used in an organic rotational no‐till system reduced the need for tillage for a period of 1.5 to 2 yr without affecting yields of organic spring wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1499 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

149 papers: 137 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 137 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

145 papers more in this group

See all 149 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

297 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,116 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.