Paper · 1987 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Differential aluminum tolerances of two barley cultivars related to organic acids in their roots

Charles D. Foy; Edward H. Lee; Stephanie B. Wilding

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
55
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract ‘Dayton’ barley is significantly more tolerant to excess Al in acid soils and nutrient solutions than is ‘Kearney’ barley; however, the physiological or biochemical mechanisms of such differential tolerance have not been clearly established. One hypothesis is that Al‐tolerant plants contain and exude organic acids or other ligands that form stable chelates with Al and thereby reduce its chemical activity and toxicity. The objective of our study was to determine the effects of Al on concentrations of organic acids in the roots of Al‐tolerant Dayton and Al‐sensitive Kearney barley cultivars. Plants were grown for 17 days in nutrient solutions containing 0, 55 and 110 μM Al (initial pH 4.5), and their roots were analyzed for organic acids by high performance liquid chromatography. Aluminum stress significantly reduced concentrations of citric, succinic and total organic acids in the roots of Al‐sensitive Kearney barley but not in those of Al‐tolerant Dayton. Aluminum decreased concentrations of levulinic acid much more than citric acid, and to a much greater degree in Kearney than in Dayton. Hence, in the presence of Al, organic acids in the roots of the Al‐tolerant Dayton cultivar were protected from destruction, or the production of these acids was maintained more effectively than in the Al‐sensitive Kearney. Further study is needed on the distribution and chemical states of Al in plants to assess the possible role of Al‐organic acid chelation in differential Al tolerance. ZMention of a trademark or proprietory product does not constitute a guarantee or warranty of this product by the U.S. Department of Agriculture and does not imply its approval to the exclusion of other products that also may be suitable.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dayton barley was significantly more aluminum tolerant than Kearney.

Material
‘Dayton’e0
Outcome
tolerant to excess Ale0
Direction
more tolerante0
Comparator
‘Kearney’ barleye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“‘Dayton’ barley is significantly more tolerant to excess Al in acid soils and nutrient solutions than is ‘Kearney’ barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum significantly reduced citric, succinic and total organic acids in Kearney roots.

Material
Kearneye0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Aluminum stresse0
Outcome
concentrations of citric, succinic and total organic acidse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum stress significantly reduced concentrations of citric, succinic and total organic acids in the roots of Al‐sensitive Kearney barley but not in those of Al‐tolerant Dayton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum did not significantly reduce those organic acids in Dayton roots.

Material
Daytone0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
Aluminum stresse0
Outcome
concentrations of citric, succinic and total organic acidse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum stress significantly reduced concentrations of citric, succinic and total organic acids in the roots of Al‐sensitive Kearney barley but not in those of Al‐tolerant Dayton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–977 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aluminum decreased levulinic acid more than citric acid.

Organ / stage
rootst0
Treatment
Aluminume0
Outcome
concentrations of levulinic acide0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
citric acide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum decreased concentrations of levulinic acid much more than citric acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1057 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley cultivars related to organic acids in their roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The aluminum-associated decline in levulinic acid was greater in Kearney than Dayton.

Material
Kearneye0
Treatment
Aluminume0
Outcome
concentrations of levulinic acide0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
Daytone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aluminum decreased concentrations of levulinic acid much more than citric acid, and to a much greater degree in Kearney than in Dayton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1113 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–46 · show in text ↑

aluminium atom · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 2 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

heavy metal · molecular: metabolites · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.