Paper · 2008 · Italian Journal of Agronomy

Nitrogen Balance During Sweet Sorghum Cropping Cycle as Affected by Irrigation and Fertilization Rate

Stella Lovelli; Gerardina Posca; Michele Perniola; et al.

10
claims
22
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

A two-year trial was carried out on sweet sorghum, grown in semi-arid environments of southern Europe. The trial was aimed to monitor the main components of the crop N-balance under different irrigation regimes and nitrogen fertilization rates, in factorial combination. A rainfed condition (only one watering soon after sowing) was compared with a deficit irrigation regime and a full irrigation treatment (50 and 100% restoration of total crop water consumption, respectively). Crop nitrogen uptake always showed to be the highest N-balance components and was included in the range of 125-194 kg ha-1 during 1997-1998, with respect to the total shoot biomass, according to the nitrogen fertilization rate; consequently, it significantly reduced both nitrogen concentration in the soil solution and the total nitrogen loss due to drainage. Nitrogen concentration in the drainage water didn’t result to be strictly dependent on the rate of fertiliser applied but on the actual soil nitrogen content; the maximum registered value of total nitrogen lost by leaching was 1.9 kg ha-1. Differently, total nitrogen loss due to volatilisation was proportional to the amount of fertilizer applied; irrigation favourably reduced this kind of loss. The limited amount of Nvolatilisation loss was probably due to the neutral pH soil conditions; as an order of magnitude, referring to the highest fertilized but rainfed treatment, the utmost N-volatilisation loss was equal to 5.5 Kg ha-1, as an average over the three years, that is to say less than the 5% of the fertilization rate. A fertilisation rate of 120 Kg ha-1 of nitrogen, together with water application, generally produced a balance between crop N-uptake and total N-loss due to volatilisation and drainage (only the stalk biomass was considered in this calculation). Lower rates of fertilizing nitrogen, indeed, determined a depletion in the soil nitrogen content because of the high crop biomass and the strong N-uptake by the crop, while rainfed conditions at the highest fertilization rate generally established a N-surplus.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop nitrogen uptake was the largest nitrogen balance component at 125-194 kg ha-1.

Taxon
sweet sorghume1
Outcome
Crop nitrogen uptakee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
125-194 kg ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Crop nitrogen uptake always showed to be the highest N-balance components and was included in the range of 125-194 kg ha-1 during 1997-1998”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–619 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Crop nitrogen uptake reduced soil solution nitrogen concentration and drainage loss.

Taxon
sweet sorghume2
Outcome
nitrogen concentration in the soil solution and the total nitrogen loss due to drainagee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
Crop nitrogen uptakee1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorTreatmentComparatorSetting

Schema note from the model: The reported association is attributed to uptake but the schema relation factor is a physiological process.

Verbatim

e0

“it significantly reduced both nitrogen concentration in the soil solution and the total nitrogen loss due to drainage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–839 · show in text ↑
e1

“Crop nitrogen uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–500 · show in text ↑
e2

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drainage water nitrogen concentration depended on actual soil nitrogen content.

Taxon
sweet sorghume1
Treatment
rate of fertiliser appliede0
Outcome
Nitrogen concentration in the drainage watere0
Qualifier
actual soil nitrogen contente0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen concentration in the drainage water didn’t result to be strictly dependent on the rate of fertiliser applied but on the actual soil nitrogen content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–998 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum total nitrogen loss through leaching was 1.9 kg ha-1.

Taxon
sweet sorghume1
Outcome
total nitrogen lost by leachinge0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1.9 kg ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum registered value of total nitrogen lost by leaching was 1.9 kg ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1000–1079 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–49 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Volatilization nitrogen loss increased with fertilizer amount.

Taxon
sweet sorghume1
Treatment
amount of fertilizer appliede0
Outcome
total nitrogen loss due to volatilisatione0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“total nitrogen loss due to volatilisation was proportional to the amount of fertilizer applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1188 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation reduced nitrogen loss through volatilization.

Taxon
sweet sorghume2
Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
total nitrogen loss due to volatilisatione1
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation favourably reduced this kind of loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1190–1237 · show in text ↑
e1

“total nitrogen loss due to volatilisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1135 · show in text ↑
e2

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum volatilization loss under the highest fertilized rainfed treatment was 5.5 Kg ha-1 and less than 5% of fertilizer rate.

Taxon
sweet sorghume1
Treatment
highest fertilized but rainfed treatmente0
Outcome
N-volatilisation losse0
Direction
utmoste0
Value
5.5 Kg ha-1e0
Qualifier
less than the 5% of the fertilization ratee0

Verbatim

e0

“referring to the highest fertilized but rainfed treatment, the utmost N-volatilisation loss was equal to 5.5 Kg ha-1, as an average over the three years, that is to say less than the 5% of the fertilization rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1571 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 120 Kg ha-1 nitrogen rate with water application balanced crop uptake and losses.

Taxon
sweet sorghume1
Treatment
120 Kg ha-1 of nitrogen, together with water applicatione0
Outcome
balance between crop N-uptake and total N-loss due to volatilisation and drainagee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“A fertilisation rate of 120 Kg ha-1 of nitrogen, together with water application, generally produced a balance between crop N-uptake and total N-loss due to volatilisation and drainage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1573–1757 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower nitrogen fertilizer rates depleted soil nitrogen content.

Taxon
sweet sorghume1
Treatment
Lower rates of fertilizing nitrogene0
Outcome
soil nitrogen contente0
Direction
depletione0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Lower rates of fertilizing nitrogen, indeed, determined a depletion in the soil nitrogen content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–1915 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rainfed conditions at the highest fertilizer rate established a nitrogen surplus.

Taxon
sweet sorghume1
Treatment
rainfed conditions at the highest fertilization ratee0
Outcome
N-surpluse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“rainfed conditions at the highest fertilization rate generally established a N-surplus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1992–2078 · show in text ↑
e1

“sweet sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 36–49 · show in text ↑

irrigation · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

52 papers: 46 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 46 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · SorghumPositive and negative results

118 papers: 111 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 111 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

114 papers more in this group

See all 118 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.