Paper · 2014 · Weed Technology

Rolled Cotton Mulch as an Alternative Mulching Material for Transplanted Cucurbit Crops

W. Carroll Johnson; James N. Ray; Jerry W. Davis

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Cantaloupe and watermelon growers in the southeastern United States use a system of hybrid transplants grown on narrow low-density polyethylene (LDPE) mulch-covered seedbeds with overhead irrigation and use the mulch cover for only one crop. LDPE mulches are costly to remove from the field and dispose. Biodegradable mulches that eliminate removal and disposal costs would be of significant benefit, provided that weeds are adequately suppressed. Cotton gin trash is a biodegradable waste product, composed of fiber fragments and seed pieces. Using a proprietary process, cotton gin trash can be chopped, pressed, and heated into a loose mat and stored on a continuous roll. Preliminary studies were conducted in 2010 and 2011 to determine if rolled cotton fiber mulch made from gin trash could be applied as a seedbed cover using conventional application equipment and adequately suppress weeds. Mulching materials (rolls 91 cm wide) were applied with a mulch layer that produced a finished seedbed 40 cm wide. ‘Athena' cantaloupe and ‘Crimson Sweet' watermelon were transplanted using a waterwheel transplanter. Mulching materials included rolled cotton fiber mulch sprayed with boiled linseed oil after mulch application, rolled cotton fiber mulch sprayed with black latex paint, black LDPE, and bare ground. Herbicide treatments included ethalfluralin, halosulfuron, and glyphosate applied as directed spray and nontreated with herbicides. Rolled cotton fiber mulch was easily applied with a conventional mulch layer with no modification and minimal adjustment, producing no tears or holes. Biodegradable cotton fiber mulch treated with boiled linseed oil or black latex paint suppressed weeds equally well as LDPE and all were better than bare-ground plots. Herbicides improved control of all weeds over the nontreated control and this effect was independent of weed suppression provided by seedbed mulches. Cantaloupe and watermelon yields were not affected by seedbed mulches, but were increased by weed control provided by herbicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biodegradable cotton fiber mulch treated with boiled linseed oil or black latex paint suppressed weeds equally well as LDPE mulch.

Treatment
Biodegradable cotton fiber mulch treated with boiled linseed oil or black latex painte1
Outcome
weedse1
Direction
equally welle1
Comparator
LDPEe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cantaloupe and watermelon growers in the southeastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biodegradable cotton fiber mulch treated with boiled linseed oil or black latex paint suppressed weeds equally well as LDPE and all were better than bare-ground plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biodegradable cotton fiber mulch treated with boiled linseed oil or black latex paint suppressed weeds better than bare ground.

Treatment
Biodegradable cotton fiber mulch treated with boiled linseed oil or black latex painte1
Outcome
weedse1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
bare-ground plotse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cantaloupe and watermelon growers in the southeastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e1

“Biodegradable cotton fiber mulch treated with boiled linseed oil or black latex paint suppressed weeds equally well as LDPE and all were better than bare-ground plots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1596–1762 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seedbed mulches did not affect cantaloupe and watermelon yields.

Treatment
seedbed mulchese2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
not affectede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cantaloupe and watermelon growers in the southeastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cantaloupe and watermelon yields were not affected by seedbed mulches, but were increased by weed control provided by herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1914–2042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control provided by herbicides increased cantaloupe and watermelon yields over the nontreated control.

Treatment
weed control provided by herbicidese2
Outcome
yieldse2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
nontreated controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cantaloupe and watermelon growers in the southeastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e2

“Cantaloupe and watermelon yields were not affected by seedbed mulches, but were increased by weed control provided by herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1914–2042 · show in text ↑
e3

“Herbicides improved control of all weeds over the nontreated control and this effect was independent of weed suppression provided by seedbed mulches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides improved control of all weeds over the nontreated control.

Treatment
Herbicidese3
Outcome
control of all weedse3
Direction
improvede3
Comparator
nontreated controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cantaloupe and watermelon growers in the southeastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e3

“Herbicides improved control of all weeds over the nontreated control and this effect was independent of weed suppression provided by seedbed mulches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1912 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide effect on weed control was independent of weed suppression by seedbed mulches.

Treatment
seedbed mulchese3
Outcome
control of all weedse3
Direction
no_changeinferrede3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cantaloupe and watermelon growers in the southeastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e3

“Herbicides improved control of all weeds over the nontreated control and this effect was independent of weed suppression provided by seedbed mulches”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1764–1912 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rolled cotton fiber mulch was applied with a conventional mulch layer without tears or holes.

Treatment
Rolled cotton fiber mulche4
Outcome
tears or holese4
Value
no tears or holese4
Comparator
conventional mulch layere4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Citrullus lanatus
Citrullus lanatus · TaxonKumon · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo
Cucumis melo var. cantalupo · TaxonRasbak at Dutch Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cantaloupe and watermelon growers in the southeastern United States”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 · show in text ↑
e4

“Rolled cotton fiber mulch was easily applied with a conventional mulch layer with no modification and minimal adjustment, producing no tears or holes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1594 · show in text ↑

mulching · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results differ

44 papers: 36 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

herbicide · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · weed · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · weed · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mulching · weed · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

herbicide · yield · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

mulching · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 37 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 37 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

mulching · weed · Citrullus lanatus (watermelon)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.