Paper · 2006 · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions

FSR1 Is Essential for Virulence and Female Fertility in Fusarium verticillioides and F. graminearum

Won-Bo Shim; Uma Shankar Sagaram; Yoon-E Choi; et al.

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
88
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Fusarium verticillioides (teleomorph Gibberella moniliformis) and F. graminearum (teleomorph G. zeae) are well known to cause devastating diseases on cereal crops. Despite their importance, our understanding of the molecular mechanisms involved in these host-pathogen interactions is limited. The FSR1 locus in F. verticillioides was identified by screening REMI mutants for loss of virulence in maize stalk rot inoculation studies. FSR1 encodes an 823-codon open reading frame interrupted by two introns. The Fsr1 protein shares 60% sequence identity with the Sordaria macrospora Pro11, a multimodular protein with four putative protein-protein binding domains (caveolin-binding domain, coiled-coil structure, calmodulin-binding motif, and seven-WD40 repeats), which plays a regulatory role in cell differentiation and ascocarp development. Our data demonstrate that FSR1 is essential for female fertility and virulence in F. verticillioides. Significantly, targeted disruption of the FSR1 ortholog in F. graminearum (FgFSR1) reduced virulence on barley and deterred perithecia formation. Cross-complementation experiments demonstrated that the gene function is conserved in the two Fusarium species. FSR1 is expressed constitutively, and we hypothesize that Fsr1 regulates virulence by acting as a scaffold for a signal transduction pathway. A survey of available genome databases indicates Fsr1 homologs are present in a number of filamentous fungi and animal systems but not in budding yeast or plants. A maximum likelihood analysis of this gene family reveals well-supported monophyletic clades associated with fungi and animals.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FSR1 was identified in a screen for loss of virulence in maize stalk rot.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Interactor
F. verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese0pathogen
Gene
FSR1e0
Outcome
loss of virulence in maize stalk rote0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The FSR1 locus in F. verticillioides was identified by screening REMI mutants for loss of virulence in maize stalk rot inoculation studies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–432 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FSR1 is essential for F. verticillioides virulence.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
F. verticillioidesFusarium verticillioidese0pathogen
Gene
FSR1e0
Outcome
virulence in F. verticillioidese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium verticillioides
Fusarium verticillioides · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Our data demonstrate that FSR1 is essential for female fertility and virulence in F. verticillioides.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 842–943 · show in text ↑
e1

“The FSR1 locus in F. verticillioides was identified by screening REMI mutants for loss of virulence in maize stalk rot inoculation studies.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–432 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disruption of FgFSR1 reduced F. graminearum virulence on barley.

Treatment
targeted disruption of the FSR1 orthologe0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Gene
FgFSR1e0
Outcome
virulence on barleye0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“targeted disruption of the FSR1 ortholog in F. graminearum (FgFSR1) reduced virulence on barley and deterred perithecia formation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1089 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Disruption of FgFSR1 deterred perithecia formation.

Treatment
targeted disruption of the FSR1 orthologe0
Interactor
F. graminearumFusarium graminearume0pathogen
Gene
FgFSR1e0
Outcome
perithecia formatione0
Direction
deterrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium graminearum
Fusarium graminearum · InteractorScot Nelson from Honolulu, USA · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“targeted disruption of the FSR1 ortholog in F. graminearum (FgFSR1) reduced virulence on barley and deterred perithecia formation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1089 · show in text ↑

loss of function · Fusarium graminearum · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 3 positive, 5 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.