Abstract

SUMMARY An experiment to investigate the effect of planting pattern, time of planting the cowpea, and insecticide application on the yield of intercropped cotton and cowpea showed that insecticide applied to the cotton controlled cowpea pests best when the crops were planted in alternating single rows. I n wet seasons, delayed planting of the cowpea reduced its yield but its performance was better in alternating single rows than in other planting patterns. In drier seasons, cowpea yield was unaffected by time of planting and yields were similar with alternating single or double rows. Cotton yield was reduced by 47% when the planting pattern was changed to a one cotton:two cowpea row configuration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton insecticide controlled cowpea pests best in alternating single rows.

Treatment
insecticide applied to the cottone0
Outcome
cowpea pestse0
Direction
beste0
Qualifier
alternating single rowse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“insecticide applied to the cotton controlled cowpea pests best when the crops were planted in alternating single rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–302 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Delayed planting reduced cowpea yield in wet seasons.

Treatment
delayed plantinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
wet seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wet seasons, delayed planting of the cowpea reduced its yield”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 304–369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In wet seasons, cowpea performed better in alternating single rows than other patterns.

Treatment
alternating single rowse0
Outcome
performancee0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other planting patternse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“its performance was better in alternating single rows than in other planting patterns”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–459 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fitting Short Duration Cowpea into a Cotton-Based Cropping System in Tanzania: Effect of Planting Pattern, Time of Planting Cowpea, and Insecticide Application to the Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea yield in drier seasons was unaffected by planting time.

Treatment
time of plantinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
unaffectede0
Qualifier
drier seasonse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In drier seasons, cowpea yield was unaffected by time of planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 461–526 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In drier seasons, cowpea yields were similar under alternating single and double rows.

Treatment
alternating singlee0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Comparator
double rowse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yields were similar with alternating single or double rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fitting Short Duration Cowpea into a Cotton-Based Cropping System in Tanzania: Effect of Planting Pattern, Time of Planting Cowpea, and Insecticide Application to the Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing to one cotton:two cowpea rows reduced cotton yield by 47%.

Treatment
one cotton:two cowpea row configuratione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
47%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cotton yield was reduced by 47% when the planting pattern was changed to a one cotton:two cowpea row configuration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–705 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

insecticide · pest · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 23 positive, 1 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

sowing time · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 18 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.