Paper · 1973 · Botanical Gazette

Interaction of Photoperiodic Dosage and Plant Age on Rice. I. Effects of Short Photoperiod on a Late-Winter Rice

G. Misra; P. A. Khan

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of an 8-hr photoperiod given to 7-, 14-, 21-, 28-, 35-, and 42-day-old seedlings for 1-, 2-, or 3-week periods at each age were studied in a late-winter variety of Indica rice. This photoperiod caused a remarkable delay in heading in the 7-day-old seedlings; treatment for 1 and 2 weeks gave no response in 14-day-old seedlings, but the same for 3 weeks caused a significant earliness of 78 days. Thus, this variety appears to cross the critical juvenile stage at the age of 14 days. The short photoperiod for a 1-week period delayed ear emergence in 21-day-old seedlings but for the 2- and 3-week periods markedly induced earlier flowering. Within 28 to 42 days of germination the short photoperiod caused a significant earliness in heading compared with control plants. Twenty-eight days appear to be the optimum age of photoresponsiveness for this variety, because at this age maximum earliness in ear emergence is seen with the minimum dose of the short photoperiod. A short photoperiod, in general, inhibited the production of tillers and leaves and markedly reduced plant height. It significantly decreased the grain yield from that of the controls, the decrease depending on the age at which the short photoperiod was administered and the duration of the treatment given at each age.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An eight-hour photoperiod delayed heading in seven-day-old rice seedlings.

Organ / stage
7-day-old seedlingse0
Treatment
8-hr photoperiode1
Outcome
headinge0
Direction
delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This photoperiod caused a remarkable delay in heading in the 7-day-old seedlings;”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 189–270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Age on Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
e1

“an 8-hr photoperiod”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 15–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One or two weeks of short photoperiod caused no response at age 14 days.

Organ / stage
14-day-old seedlingse0
Treatment
treatment for 1 and 2 weekse0
Outcome
responsee0
Direction
no responsee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment for 1 and 2 weeks gave no response in 14-day-old seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 271–339 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Age on Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Three weeks of short photoperiod advanced heading by 78 days at age 14 days.

Treatment
3 weekse0
Outcome
earlinesse0
Direction
earlinesse0
Value
78 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but the same for 3 weeks caused a significant earliness of 78 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–408 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Age on Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The variety appears to cross the critical juvenile stage at 14 days.

Outcome
cross the critical juvenile stagee0
Value
14 dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, this variety appears to cross the critical juvenile stage at the age of 14 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 409–495 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Age on Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One week of short photoperiod delayed ear emergence in 21-day-old seedlings.

Organ / stage
21-day-old seedlingse0
Treatment
short photoperiod for a 1-week periode0
Outcome
ear emergencee0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The short photoperiod for a 1-week period delayed ear emergence in 21-day-old seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 496–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Age on Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two or three weeks of short photoperiod advanced flowering at age 21 days.

Treatment
2- and 3-week periodse0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
earliere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but for the 2- and 3-week periods markedly induced earlier flowering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Age on Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Short photoperiod advanced heading in plants aged 28 to 42 days relative to controls.

Treatment
short photoperiode0
Outcome
headinge0
Direction
earlinesse0
Qualifier
28 to 42 days of germinatione0
Comparator
control plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Within 28 to 42 days of germination the short photoperiod caused a significant earliness in heading compared with control plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Age on Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice at 28 days had maximal ear emergence advancement with the minimum short-photoperiod dose.

Outcome
maximum earliness in ear emergencee0
Direction
maximume0
Value
Twenty-eight dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Twenty-eight days appear to be the optimum age of photoresponsiveness for this variety, because at this age maximum earliness in ear emergence is seen with the minimum dose of the short photoperiod.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 784–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Age on Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Short photoperiod inhibited tiller and leaf production and reduced height.

Treatment
short photoperiode0
Outcome
production of tillers and leavese0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A short photoperiod, in general, inhibited the production of tillers and leaves and markedly reduced plant height.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1097 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Age on Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Short photoperiod reduced grain yield depending on seedling age and exposure duration.

Treatment
short photoperiode0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
age at which the short photoperiod was administered and the duration of the treatmente0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It significantly decreased the grain yield from that of the controls, the decrease depending on the age at which the short photoperiod was administered and the duration of the treatment given at each age.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“Plant Age on Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–57 · show in text ↑

light · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

68 papers: 36 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

light · phenology · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 14 positive, 10 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

light · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 55 positive, 40 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 55 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.