Paper · 2013 · International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability

Profitability and opportunity of conservation agriculture in acid savannah grasslands of Laos

Pascal Lienhard; Khamkéo Panyasiri; Sengphanh Sayphoummie; et al.

5
claims
14
verbatim quotes
15
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In north-eastern Laos, the savannah grasslands of the Plain of Jars cover vast areas of potentially cultivable land. However, soil acidity, low inherent fertility, and the absence of alternatives to tillage represent significant constraints to the development of sustainable smallholder agriculture. Our objective was to evaluate the potential for conservation agriculture (CA) to enhance soil productivity and farming system profitability. A three-year rotation of rice/maize/soybean was tested under three fertilization levels and four agricultural systems: one conventional tillage-based (CT) system and three CA systems based on no-tillage with cover crops. After four cropping seasons, our results show that, compared with CT, CA systems led to similar-to-higher grain production, similar-to-higher profits, higher opportunity of livestock system intensification, and higher labour productivity regardless of fertilization levels. While CA represents a relevant alternative to current practices, our results suggest that its contribution to the emergence of a sustainable smallholder agriculture is conditioned by broader institutional transformations, including the enrolment of local manufacturers and traders for deploying no-till implements and seed market channels for cover crops, long-term public support to maintain active research and technical mentoring to farmers, and possibly the integration of ecosystem services in agricultural policy.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with conventional tillage, conservation agriculture gave similar-to-higher grain production in the rice/maize/soybean rotation.

Taxon
rice/maize/soybeanGlycine maxOryza sativaZea mayse2
Treatment
no-tillage with cover cropse2
Outcome
grain productione1
Direction
similar-to-highere1
Qualifier
regardless of fertilization levelse1
Comparator
CTe1
Setting
north-eastern Laose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In north-eastern Laos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with CT, CA systems led to similar-to-higher grain production, similar-to-higher profits, higher opportunity of livestock system intensification, and higher labour productivity regardless of fertilization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–934 · show in text ↑
e2

“A three-year rotation of rice/maize/soybean was tested under three fertilization levels and four agricultural systems: one conventional tillage-based (CT) system and three CA systems based on no-tillage with cover crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with conventional tillage, conservation agriculture gave similar-to-higher profits in the rice/maize/soybean rotation.

Taxon
rice/maize/soybeanGlycine maxOryza sativaZea mayse2
Treatment
no-tillage with cover cropse2
Outcome
profitse1
Direction
similar-to-highere1
Qualifier
regardless of fertilization levelse1
Comparator
CTe1
Setting
north-eastern Laose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In north-eastern Laos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with CT, CA systems led to similar-to-higher grain production, similar-to-higher profits, higher opportunity of livestock system intensification, and higher labour productivity regardless of fertilization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–934 · show in text ↑
e2

“A three-year rotation of rice/maize/soybean was tested under three fertilization levels and four agricultural systems: one conventional tillage-based (CT) system and three CA systems based on no-tillage with cover crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with conventional tillage, conservation agriculture gave higher opportunity of livestock system intensification.

Taxon
rice/maize/soybeanGlycine maxOryza sativaZea mayse2
Treatment
no-tillage with cover cropse2
Outcome
opportunity of livestock system intensificatione1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
regardless of fertilization levelse1
Comparator
CTe1
Setting
north-eastern Laose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In north-eastern Laos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with CT, CA systems led to similar-to-higher grain production, similar-to-higher profits, higher opportunity of livestock system intensification, and higher labour productivity regardless of fertilization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–934 · show in text ↑
e2

“A three-year rotation of rice/maize/soybean was tested under three fertilization levels and four agricultural systems: one conventional tillage-based (CT) system and three CA systems based on no-tillage with cover crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compared with conventional tillage, conservation agriculture gave higher labour productivity.

Taxon
rice/maize/soybeanGlycine maxOryza sativaZea mayse2
Treatment
no-tillage with cover cropse2
Outcome
labour productivitye1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
regardless of fertilization levelse1
Comparator
CTe1
Setting
north-eastern Laose0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In north-eastern Laos”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–21 · show in text ↑
e1

“compared with CT, CA systems led to similar-to-higher grain production, similar-to-higher profits, higher opportunity of livestock system intensification, and higher labour productivity regardless of fertilization levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–934 · show in text ↑
e2

“A three-year rotation of rice/maize/soybean was tested under three fertilization levels and four agricultural systems: one conventional tillage-based (CT) system and three CA systems based on no-tillage with cover crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–660 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture contributes to a sustainable smallholder agriculture only if broader institutional transformations occur.

Taxon
rice/maize/soybeanGlycine maxOryza sativaZea mayse2
Outcome
contribution to the emergence of a sustainable smallholder agriculturee3
Qualifier
conditioned by broader institutional transformationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“A three-year rotation of rice/maize/soybean was tested under three fertilization levels and four agricultural systems: one conventional tillage-based (CT) system and three CA systems based on no-tillage with cover crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 441–660 · show in text ↑
e3

“While CA represents a relevant alternative to current practices, our results suggest that its contribution to the emergence of a sustainable smallholder agriculture is conditioned by broader institutional transformations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1156 · show in text ↑

cover crop · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

25 papers: 17 positive, 8 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

cover crop · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

101 papers: 33 positive, 68 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 57 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

97 papers more in this group

See all 101 papers →

cover crop · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 104 positive, 118 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 104 in the opposite direction · 14 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.