Paper · 2014 · Agricultural Science

Effect of Soil Water Environment and Simulated Savanna Climate on Growth and Mineral Nutrition in Jatropha curcas L.

Hiroshi Matsumoto; Rumana Yeasmin; Frank Kalemelawa; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the optimal soil water conditions for J. curcas L. cultivation under the bi-annual rain seasons of the African Savannah climate. Changes in J. curcas L. seedling biomass and mineral nutrient uptake and movement patterns were examined under soil water matric potentials of-2.5,-2.9,-3.4 and-4.0kPa, and two rain seasons separated by a dry spell. The bi-annual savannah rain conditions were simulated using automated buried-type tensiometer system. During the first rain season (irrigation),-3.4kPa soil water matric potential showed the highest water-use efficiency (2.44 g dry weight L-) and biomass yield (57.14g). Seedlings were variously affected by the subsequent dry spell, including total defoliation and stunting. On re-irrigation, seedling recovery (biomass and water use efficiency) was less as compared to the first rain season. Among the nutrients monitored, N, P and K were the most predominantly uptaken, with N showing the closest correlation with seedling growth. Soil matric water potential of -3.4 kPa is the optimum soil water environment for J. curcas cultivation in the savannah conditions; additionally,

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At -3.4 kPa during the first irrigated rain season, seedlings had the highest water-use efficiency of 2.44 g dry weight L-.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
-3.4kPa soil water matric potentiale0
Outcome
water-use efficiencye0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2.44 g dry weight L-e0
Setting
first rain season (irrigation)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the first rain season (irrigation),-3.4kPa soil water matric potential showed the highest water-use efficiency (2.44 g dry weight L-)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–617 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At -3.4 kPa during the first irrigated rain season, seedlings had the highest biomass yield of 57.14g.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
-3.4kPa soil water matric potentiale0
Outcome
biomass yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
57.14ge0
Setting
first rain season (irrigation)e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“During the first rain season (irrigation),-3.4kPa soil water matric potential showed the highest water-use efficiency (2.44 g dry weight L-) and biomass yield (57.14g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–644 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The subsequent dry spell caused total defoliation in some seedlings.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
subsequent dry spelle0
Outcome
total defoliatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings were variously affected by the subsequent dry spell, including total defoliation and stunting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The subsequent dry spell caused stunting in some seedlings.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
subsequent dry spelle0
Outcome
stuntinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings were variously affected by the subsequent dry spell, including total defoliation and stunting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–750 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On re-irrigation, seedling biomass recovery was less than in the first rain season.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
re-irrigatione0
Outcome
biomasse0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
first rain seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On re-irrigation, seedling recovery (biomass and water use efficiency) was less as compared to the first rain season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–116 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

On re-irrigation, seedling water-use-efficiency recovery was less than in the first rain season.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Treatment
re-irrigatione0
Outcome
water use efficiencye0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
first rain seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On re-irrigation, seedling recovery (biomass and water use efficiency) was less as compared to the first rain season.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 751–868 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N, P and K were the nutrients most predominantly taken up by seedlings.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Outcome
N, P and K were the most predominantly uptakene0
Direction
most predominantlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the nutrients monitored, N, P and K were the most predominantly uptaken”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–946 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–116 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake had the closest correlation with seedling growth.

Taxon
Jatropha curcas L.Jatropha curcast0
Compound
Ne0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
closest correlatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N showing the closest correlation with seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1007 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the nutrients monitored, N, P and K were the most predominantly uptaken, with N showing the closest correlation with seedling growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–116 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors identify -3.4 kPa soil matric potential as optimal for Jatropha cultivation under savanna conditions.

Taxon
J. curcasJatropha curcase0
Treatment
-3.4 kPae0
Outcome
optimum soil water environmente0
Setting
savannah conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Jatropha curcas
Jatropha curcas · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAdityamadhav83 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil matric water potential of -3.4 kPa is the optimum soil water environment for J. curcas cultivation in the savannah conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1009–1139 · show in text ↑
t0

“Jatropha curcas L.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–116 · show in text ↑

soil water · yield · Jatropha curcasPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

drought · pest · Jatropha curcasResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.