Paper · 1989 · New Phytologist

Physiology and yield of field‐grown Brassica oleracea L. exposed to acidic fog

B. K. TAKEMOTO; A. G. JOHNSON; C. R. PARADA; et al.

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Field‐grown Brassica oleracea L. ev. Emperor (broccoli) plants were exposed to a range of treatments with simulated acidic fog in open‐field plots to examine the effect of fog chemistry on yield and growth, and to determine whether alterations in yield or growth were related to the development of foliar injury and/or the inhibition of net photosynthesis. Simulated fogs (i.e. pH values of 1.76, 2.23, 2.72, 3.22 or 5.48) with a liquid water content of 0.20–0.25 g m −3 were applied twice weekly for 10 weeks. Applications of pH 1.76 fog caused significant yield reductions (37%) relative to pH 5.48. Leaf dry weight responses were more sensitive to fog chemistry than yield. Leaf dry weight was significantly inhibited by 53, 25 and 9% in the pH 1.76, 2.23, and 2.72 fog treatment groups, respectively. The depression of yield by fog of pH 1.76 was closely correlated with the development of foliar injury and the inhibition of net photosynthesis on a percentage basis. Plants exposed to pH 2.23 or 1.76 fog consistently displayed amounts of injury ranging from 5 to 7% or 20 to 31%, respectively, whereas plants exposed to pH 2.72 fog or higher exhibited less than 5% injury throughout the study. Whole‐study average rates of net photosynthesis were significantly depressed by pH 1.76 fog (30% lower). The inhibition of net photosynthesis was coincident with increases in both mesophyll and stomatal resistances to CO 2 , but the ratio of mesophyll to stomatal resistance was not significantly altered. These findings provide evidence that repeated exposures to highly acidic fog (pH 1.76 or 2.23) may cause significant reductions in marketable yield and/or growth of B. oleracea , but substantive adverse effects would not be expected from exposures to fog of lower acidic strength. Although the inhibition of net phososynthesis in B. oleracea by acidic fog was coincident with decreased yield, reduced rates of CO 2 assimilation appear to be due to the development of foliar injury (i.e. reduced photosynthetically active leaf area per plant) rather than a specific alteration in mesophyll or stomatal resistance to CO 2 .

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PH 1.76 fog caused significant yield reductions of about 37% in broccoli relative to pH 5.48.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea L.Brassica oleraceae0
Treatment
pH 1.76 foge1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
reductionse1
Value
37%e1
Comparator
pH 5.48e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica oleracea L. ev. Emperor (broccoli) plants were exposed to a range of treatments with simulated acidic fog”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“Applications of pH 1.76 fog caused significant yield reductions (37%) relative to pH 5.48”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–608 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf dry weight responses were more sensitive to fog chemistry than yield in broccoli.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea L.Brassica oleraceae0
Outcome
Leaf dry weight responsese2
Direction
more sensitivee2
Qualifier
to fog chemistrye2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica oleracea L. ev. Emperor (broccoli) plants were exposed to a range of treatments with simulated acidic fog”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–134 · show in text ↑
e2

“Leaf dry weight responses were more sensitive to fog chemistry than yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 610–683 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf dry weight was significantly inhibited by 53% in the pH 1.76 fog treatment.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea L.Brassica oleraceae0
Treatment
pH 1.76e3
Outcome
Leaf dry weighte3
Direction
inhibitede3
Value
53e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica oleracea L. ev. Emperor (broccoli) plants were exposed to a range of treatments with simulated acidic fog”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–134 · show in text ↑
e3

“Leaf dry weight was significantly inhibited by 53, 25 and 9% in the pH 1.76, 2.23, and 2.72 fog treatment groups, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf dry weight was significantly inhibited by 25% in the pH 2.23 fog treatment.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea L.Brassica oleraceae0
Treatment
2.23e3
Outcome
Leaf dry weighte3
Direction
inhibitede3
Value
25e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica oleracea L. ev. Emperor (broccoli) plants were exposed to a range of treatments with simulated acidic fog”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–134 · show in text ↑
e3

“Leaf dry weight was significantly inhibited by 53, 25 and 9% in the pH 1.76, 2.23, and 2.72 fog treatment groups, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–811 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf dry weight was significantly inhibited by 9% in the pH 2.72 fog treatment.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea L.Brassica oleraceae0
Treatment
2.72e3
Outcome
Leaf dry weighte3
Direction
inhibitede3
Value
9e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica oleracea L. ev. Emperor (broccoli) plants were exposed to a range of treatments with simulated acidic fog”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–134 · show in text ↑
e3

“Leaf dry weight was significantly inhibited by 53, 25 and 9% in the pH 1.76, 2.23, and 2.72 fog treatment groups, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 685–811 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The depression of yield by pH 1.76 fog was closely correlated with foliar injury and inhibition of net photosynthesis.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea L.Brassica oleraceae0
Treatment
fog of pH 1.76e4
Outcome
yielde4
Qualifier
closely correlatede4

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica oleracea L. ev. Emperor (broccoli) plants were exposed to a range of treatments with simulated acidic fog”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–134 · show in text ↑
e4

“The depression of yield by fog of pH 1.76 was closely correlated with the development of foliar injury and the inhibition of net photosynthesis on a percentage basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 813–978 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli exposed to pH 2.23 or 1.76 fog displayed foliar injury of 5 to 7% or 20 to 31%.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea L.Brassica oleraceae0
Treatment
pH 2.23 or 1.76 foge5
Outcome
injurye5
Value
5 to 7%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica oleracea L. ev. Emperor (broccoli) plants were exposed to a range of treatments with simulated acidic fog”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–134 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plants exposed to pH 2.23 or 1.76 fog consistently displayed amounts of injury ranging from 5 to 7% or 20 to 31%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1092 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli exposed to pH 2.23 or 1.76 fog displayed foliar injury of 20 to 31% (pH 1.76 group).

Taxon
Brassica oleracea L.Brassica oleraceae0
Treatment
pH 2.23 or 1.76 foge5
Outcome
injurye5
Value
20 to 31%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica oleracea L. ev. Emperor (broccoli) plants were exposed to a range of treatments with simulated acidic fog”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–134 · show in text ↑
e5

“Plants exposed to pH 2.23 or 1.76 fog consistently displayed amounts of injury ranging from 5 to 7% or 20 to 31%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1092 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broccoli exposed to pH 2.72 fog or higher showed less than 5% foliar injury.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea L.Brassica oleraceae0
Treatment
pH 2.72 fog or highere5
Outcome
injurye5
Value
less than 5%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica oleracea L. ev. Emperor (broccoli) plants were exposed to a range of treatments with simulated acidic fog”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–134 · show in text ↑
e5

“whereas plants exposed to pH 2.72 fog or higher exhibited less than 5% injury throughout the study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1108–1206 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PH 1.76 fog significantly depressed net photosynthesis rates of broccoli by 30%.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea L.Brassica oleraceae0
Treatment
pH 1.76 foge6
Outcome
rates of net photosynthesise6
Direction
depressede6
Value
30%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica oleracea L. ev. Emperor (broccoli) plants were exposed to a range of treatments with simulated acidic fog”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–134 · show in text ↑
e6

“rates of net photosynthesis were significantly depressed by pH 1.76 fog (30% lower)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1311 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inhibition of net photosynthesis in broccoli coincided with increased mesophyll and stomatal resistances to CO 2.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea L.Brassica oleraceae0
Compound
CO 2e7
Outcome
mesophyll and stomatal resistancese7
Direction
increasese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica oleracea L. ev. Emperor (broccoli) plants were exposed to a range of treatments with simulated acidic fog”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–134 · show in text ↑
e7

“The inhibition of net photosynthesis was coincident with increases in both mesophyll and stomatal resistances to CO 2 , but the ratio of mesophyll to stomatal resistance was not significantly altered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1512 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The ratio of mesophyll to stomatal resistance in broccoli was not significantly altered by acidic fog.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea L.Brassica oleraceae0
Outcome
ratio of mesophyll to stomatal resistancee7
Qualifier
not significantly alterede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica oleracea L. ev. Emperor (broccoli) plants were exposed to a range of treatments with simulated acidic fog”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–134 · show in text ↑
e7

“but the ratio of mesophyll to stomatal resistance was not significantly altered”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1433–1512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated exposures to highly acidic fog may cause significant reductions in marketable yield and/or growth of broccoli.

Taxon
B. oleraceaBrassica oleraceae1
Treatment
repeated exposures to highly acidic foge1
Outcome
marketable yield and/or growthe1
Direction
reductionse1
Qualifier
maye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“repeated exposures to highly acidic fog (pH 1.76 or 2.23) may cause significant reductions in marketable yield and/or growth of B. oleracea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1551–1690 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced CO 2 assimilation in broccoli appears to be due to foliar injury rather than altered mesophyll or stomatal resistance.

Taxon
Brassica oleracea L.Brassica oleraceae0
Outcome
rates of CO 2 assimilatione1
Qualifier
development of foliar injury (i.e. reduced photosynthetically active leaf area per plant)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea
Brassica oleracea · TaxonDaderot · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Brassica oleracea L. ev. Emperor (broccoli) plants were exposed to a range of treatments with simulated acidic fog”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 20–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“reduced rates of CO 2 assimilation appear to be due to the development of foliar injury (i.e. reduced photosynthetically active leaf area per plant) rather than a specific alteration in mesophyll or stomatal resistance to CO 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1907–2133 · show in text ↑

ph · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

ph · growth · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.