Paper · 1994 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Stem infusion of field‐grown maize

B. L. Ma; L. M. Dwyer; D. W. Stewart; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
9
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Field experiments were conducted in summer 1992 on the Central Experimental Farm, Ottawa (45°22'N, 75°43'W) to determine whether a stem infusion technique developed for maize under controlled conditions was applicable to field‐grown maize and to evaluate whether providing sucrose in solution at silking via stem infusion altered plant source‐sink relationships sufficiently to increase kernel set. The higher and more variable evaporative demand and more difficult installation under field conditions dictated modifications to the stem infusion apparatus to prevent leakage and to facilitate assembly prior to field set‐up. A range of several field parameters were tested to identify conditions that would maximize infusion of sucrose solution: raising the syringe barrel height increased the volume of solution uptake; the largest amount of sucrose was taken up using a concentration of 150 g sucrose L‐1, and consecutive multiple infusions of the same plant increased solution uptake. Solution uptake was found to be greatest in the first 24 h of infusion. Leaf soluble carbohydrate and starch concentrations and ear leaf photosynthesis were not changed by sucrose infusion. Sucrose solution infused at silking appeared to increase kernel set in one of the experimental hybrids.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Field conditions required apparatus changes to prevent leakage and ease assembly.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
prevent leakage and to facilitate assemblye0
Comparator
controlled conditionse1
Setting
field conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher and more variable evaporative demand and more difficult installation under field conditions dictated modifications to the stem infusion apparatus to prevent leakage and to facilitate assembly prior to field set‐up”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 408–632 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
e1

“stem infusion technique developed for maize under controlled conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–211 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising syringe barrel height increased solution uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
raising the syringe barrel heighte0
Outcome
volume of solution uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“raising the syringe barrel height increased the volume of solution uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

150 g sucrose L‐1 gave the largest sucrose uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
150 g sucrose L‐1e0
Outcome
amount of sucrosee0
Direction
largeste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the largest amount of sucrose was taken up using a concentration of 150 g sucrose L‐1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Repeated infusion increased solution uptake.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
consecutive multiple infusionse0
Outcome
solution uptakee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“consecutive multiple infusions of the same plant increased solution uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–995 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Solution uptake was greatest in the first 24 hours.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
Solution uptakee0
Direction
greateste0
Qualifier
first 24 h of infusione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Solution uptake was found to be greatest in the first 24 h of infusion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 997–1067 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sucrose infusion did not change leaf soluble carbohydrate and starch concentrations or ear leaf photosynthesis.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
sucrose infusione0
Outcome
Leaf soluble carbohydrate and starch concentrations and ear leaf photosynthesise0
Direction
not changede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf soluble carbohydrate and starch concentrations and ear leaf photosynthesis were not changed by sucrose infusion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1185 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silking-stage sucrose infusion appeared to increase kernel set in one hybrid.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Sucrose solution infused at silkinge0
Outcome
kernel sete0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
one of the experimental hybridse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sucrose solution infused at silking appeared to increase kernel set in one of the experimental hybrids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1289 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 29–34 · show in text ↑

sucrose · physiology: photosynthesis · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sucrose · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

sucrose · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.