Paper · 1981 · Agronomy Journal

Labeled Nitrogen Uptake by Drip‐Irrigated Tomatoes1

R. J. Miller; D. E. Rolston; R. S. Rauschkolb; et al.

5
claims
8
verbatim quotes
38
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In order to evaluate the availability of fertilizer N applied by drip irrigation, tomatoes ( Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) were grown in the field for two years on Panoche clay loam (Typic Torriorthents). Labeled fertilizer was banded in the soil and furrow or drip irrigated as well as applied through the drip system to measure the effect of different placements and timing on fertilizer N availability. Some treatments received N only at planting while others received split applications through the drip system at different stages of plant development. Nitrogen ( 15 N depleted) was applied to the center harvest rows while commercial (0.36% 15 N) ammonium sulfate was applied to the outside rows of each plot. Plants from the center harvest rows were analyzed for total N and isotopic composition. Plant analyses indicated that treatments in which fertilizer N was applied through the drip system, regardless of timing or growth stage, showed higher percent fertilizer N contents during most of the growing season than those of the furrow‐irrigated treatments. The greatest amount of fertilizer N in the plant at any sampling time was 40 to 50% of the total plant N. Only small differences in total tomato yields were observed among treatments, although drip‐applied did appear to enhance tomato fruit maturity. For high efficiency, fertilizer N should be placed carefully with respect to plant roots, taking into consideration the direction of water movement during irrigations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip applied fertilizer nitrogen increased plant fertilizer nitrogen percentages during most of the season compared with furrow irrigation.

Treatment
fertilizer N was applied through the drip systeme1
Outcome
percent fertilizer N contentse1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
regardless of timing or growth stagee1
Comparator
furrow‐irrigated treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomatoes ( Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“treatments in which fertilizer N was applied through the drip system, regardless of timing or growth stage, showed higher percent fertilizer N contents during most of the growing season than those of the furrow‐irrigated treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1075 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The maximum fertilizer nitrogen fraction at a sampling time was 40 to 50% of total plant nitrogen.

Outcome
fertilizer N in the plante1
Direction
greateste1
Value
40 to 50%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“tomatoes ( Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–132 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greatest amount of fertilizer N in the plant at any sampling time was 40 to 50% of the total plant N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1181 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total tomato yields differed only slightly among treatments.

Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
total tomato yieldse0
Direction
small differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only small differences in total tomato yields were observed among treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip applied fertilizer appeared to enhance tomato fruit maturity.

Treatment
drip‐appliede0
Outcome
tomato fruit maturitye0
Direction
enhancee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“drip‐applied did appear to enhance tomato fruit maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1325 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend careful fertilizer nitrogen placement relative to roots and irrigation water movement.

Outcome
fertilizer N should be placed carefully with respect to plant rootse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“For high efficiency, fertilizer N should be placed carefully with respect to plant roots, taking into consideration the direction of water movement during irrigations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1494 · show in text ↑
e1

“tomatoes ( Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–132 · show in text ↑

irrigation · phenology · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

irrigation · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 29 positive, 15 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

271 papers: 226 positive, 45 negative or no effect

225 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

267 papers more in this group

See all 271 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.