Abstract
Medicago hybrida Trautv. and M. suffruticosa Ram. are closely related, as indicated by their ease of hybridization, by the vigor and fertility of the F 1 , and by good pollen viability (94–98%) in the F 1 . In the F 2 , glandular hairs on pods vs. no-hairs segregated in a normal, 1:3 ratio; hairiness of M. suffruticosa was recessive to no-hair condition of M. hybrida. Coiling of pods was determined by six dominant, non-linked factors, A 1 –A 6 , with cumulative effect. M. suffruticosa possessed the dominant alleles. Neither M. hybrida nor M. suffruticosa could be hybridized with the M. sativa-falcata group, indicating their membership in different affinity groups. M. leiocarpa Benth. could be crossed with M. hybrida as well as with M. suffruticosa. Further study is needed to determine whether the M. hybrida-suffruticosa group belongs to the genus Medicago or Trigonella.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Medicago hybrida and M. suffruticosa are closely related, as indicated by ease of hybridization and the vigor and fertility of the F1.
- Taxon
- Medicago hybridaMedicago hybridae0
- Outcome
- closely relatede0
- Qualifier
- ease of hybridizatione0
Verbatim
e0“Medicago hybrida Trautv. and M. suffruticosa Ram. are closely related, as indicated by their ease of hybridization, by the vigor and fertility of the F 1 , and by good pollen viability (94–98%) in the F 1”
Claim · model-written summary
The F1 of Medicago hybrida x M. suffruticosa showed good pollen viability (94-98%).
- Taxon
- Medicago hybridaMedicago hybridae0
- Outcome
- pollen viabilitye0
- Value
- 94–98%e0
Verbatim
e0“Medicago hybrida Trautv. and M. suffruticosa Ram. are closely related, as indicated by their ease of hybridization, by the vigor and fertility of the F 1 , and by good pollen viability (94–98%) in the F 1”
Claim · model-written summary
In the F2, glandular hairs on pods versus no hairs segregated in a normal 1:3 ratio.
MedicagoOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the F 2 , glandular hairs on pods vs. no-hairs segregated in a normal, 1:3 ratio”
t0“MEDICAGO”
Claim · model-written summary
Hairiness of M. suffruticosa was recessive to the no-hair condition of M. hybrida.
- Taxon
- M. suffruticosa
Medicago suffruticosae0 - Outcome
- hairinesse0
- Qualifier
- recessive to no-hair condition of M. hybridae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“hairiness of M. suffruticosa was recessive to no-hair condition of M. hybrida”
Claim · model-written summary
Coiling of pods was determined by six dominant, non-linked factors (A1-A6) with cumulative effect.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Coiling of pods was determined by six dominant, non-linked factors, A 1 –A 6 , with cumulative effect”
t0“MEDICAGO”
Claim · model-written summary
M. suffruticosa possessed the dominant alleles for pod coiling.
- Taxon
- M. suffruticosaMedicago suffruticosae0
- Outcome
- possessed the dominant allelese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“M. suffruticosa possessed the dominant alleles”
Claim · model-written summary
M. hybrida could not be hybridized with the M. sativa-falcata group.
- Taxon
- M. hybridaMedicago hybridae0
- Outcome
- hybridizede0
- Comparator
- M. sativa-falcata groupe0
Verbatim
e0“Neither M. hybrida nor M. suffruticosa could be hybridized with the M. sativa-falcata group”
Claim · model-written summary
M. suffruticosa could not be hybridized with the M. sativa-falcata group.
- Taxon
- M. suffruticosaMedicago suffruticosae0
- Outcome
- hybridizede0
- Comparator
- M. sativa-falcata groupe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Neither M. hybrida nor M. suffruticosa could be hybridized with the M. sativa-falcata group”
Claim · model-written summary
M. leiocarpa could be crossed with both M. hybrida and M. suffruticosa.
- Taxon
- M. leiocarpaMedicago suffruticosa subsp. leiocarpae0
- Outcome
- could be crossede0
- Comparator
- M. hybrida as well as with M. suffruticosae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“M. leiocarpa Benth. could be crossed with M. hybrida as well as with M. suffruticosa”