Paper · 1990 · Functional Plant Biology

Turgor Pressure in Mechanically Impeded Lupin Roots

BJ Atwell; JC Newsome

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
25
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Seedlings of lupin (Lupinus angustifolius cv. 75A-258) were grown in cores of sandy loam which was compacted to bulk densities of 1.6 and 1.8 Mg m-3 . There was a substantial decrease in root elongation rate at the higher bulk density. After 4-7 d, roots were rinsed free of soil and clamped loosely in a Perspex block for measurement of turgor pressure (P) using a pressure probe. Measurements were made at 3-4 positions on each root, each estimation taking 2 min. Turgor pressures in the terminal 15 mm of the axes ranged between 0.213 and 0.530 at 1.6 Mg m-3 and 0.210 and 0.570 MPa at 1.8 Mg m-3; mean P values were 0.365 and 0.351 MPa in roots growing at 1.6 and 1.8 Mg m-3, respectively. These measurements were made on roots removed from the soil; P could have been greater in roots still growing in compact soil. Anatomical studies showed that the distal boundary of the zone of cell expansion was 2-4 mm nearer the apex in roots growing at 1.8 than at 1.6 Mg m-3. Using this information, we showed that the mean P of expanding tissue was the same in roots of the two treatments. The apparent rise in P near the apex of roots at 1.8 Mg m-3 was not statistically significant. Primary roots growing against high mechanical impedance had a 34% lower rate of elongation and a 22% greater diameter, resulting in nearly identical rates of volume expansion (35.1 and 34.9 mm3 d-1 at 1.6 and 1.8 Mg m-3 respectively). Furthermore, the rate of O2 uptake was the same in 10 mm root apices from both treatments so that there was no evidence that the carbohydrate requirement for respiration was enhanced by high soil strength. Moreover, while mechanical impedance decreased root elongation, it did not significantly affect our estimate of P. We believe that P in lupin roots changes in response to mechanical impedance only when volume expansion or utilization of solutes are affected.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher bulk density reduced lupin root elongation rate.

Taxon
LupinLupinust0
Treatment
higher bulk densitye0
Outcome
root elongation ratee0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a substantial decrease in root elongation rate at the higher bulk density.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 151–235 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lupin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean root turgor pressure was 0.365 MPa at 1.6 Mg m-3 and 0.351 MPa at 1.8 Mg m-3.

Taxon
LupinLupinust0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Outcome
mean P valuese0
Value
0.365 and 0.351 MPae0
Qualifier
1.6 and 1.8 Mg m-3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean P values were 0.365 and 0.351 MPa in roots growing at 1.6 and 1.8 Mg m-3, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–692 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lupin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The distal boundary of root cell expansion was 2-4 mm nearer the apex at 1.8 than 1.6 Mg m-3.

Taxon
LupinLupinust0
Treatment
1.8e0
Outcome
distal boundary of the zone of cell expansione0
Direction
nearere0
Value
2-4 mme0
Comparator
1.6 Mg m-3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the distal boundary of the zone of cell expansion was 2-4 mm nearer the apex in roots growing at 1.8 than at 1.6 Mg m-3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 852–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lupin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean turgor pressure of expanding tissue was the same under both compaction treatments.

Taxon
LupinLupinust0
Treatment
two treatmentse0
Outcome
mean P of expanding tissuee0
Direction
samee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the mean P of expanding tissue was the same in roots of the two treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1012–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lupin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The apparent apical rise in turgor at 1.8 Mg m-3 was not statistically significant.

Taxon
LupinLupinust0
Outcome
rise in P near the apex of rootse0
Direction
risee0
Qualifier
1.8 Mg m-3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The apparent rise in P near the apex of roots at 1.8 Mg m-3 was not statistically significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1181 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lupin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High mechanical impedance lowered primary-root elongation rate by 34%.

Taxon
LupinLupinust0
Treatment
high mechanical impedancee0
Outcome
rate of elongatione0
Direction
lowere0
Value
34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Primary roots growing against high mechanical impedance had a 34% lower rate of elongation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1273 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lupin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High mechanical impedance increased primary-root diameter by 22%.

Taxon
LupinLupinust0
Treatment
high mechanical impedancee0
Outcome
diametere0
Direction
greatere0
Value
22%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Primary roots growing against high mechanical impedance had a 34% lower rate of elongation and a 22% greater diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1300 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lupin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Primary-root volume expansion rates were nearly identical at the two soil densities.

Taxon
LupinLupinust0
Treatment
1.8 Mg m-3e0
Outcome
rates of volume expansione0
Direction
nearly identicale0
Value
35.1 and 34.9 mm3 d-1e0
Comparator
1.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nearly identical rates of volume expansion (35.1 and 34.9 mm3 d-1 at 1.6 and 1.8 Mg m-3 respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1315–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lupin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Oxygen uptake in 10 mm root apices was the same across treatments.

Taxon
LupinLupinust0
Organ / stage
root apicese0
Treatment
both treatmentse0
Outcome
rate of O2 uptakee0
Direction
samee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the rate of O2 uptake was the same in 10 mm root apices from both treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1507 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lupin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mechanical impedance did not significantly affect estimated turgor pressure.

Taxon
LupinLupinust0
Treatment
mechanical impedancee0
Outcome
estimate of Pe0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mechanical impedance decreased root elongation, it did not significantly affect our estimate of P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1640–1737 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lupin Roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 40–51 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that root turgor changes under impedance only when volume expansion or solute use changes.

Taxon
lupinLupinuse0
Treatment
mechanical impedancee0
Outcome
P in lupin rootse0
Qualifier
only when volume expansion or utilization of solutes are affectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lupinus
Lupinus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Jean-Claude Echardour [CC BY-SA], via Tela Botanica · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“P in lupin roots changes in response to mechanical impedance only when volume expansion or utilization of solutes are affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1755–1881 · show in text ↑