Paper · 2009 · Journal of Forest Research

Variation in germination character ofRobinia pseudoacaciaL. (Leguminosae) seeds at individual tree level

Kazuhiko Masaka; Kenji Yamada

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
46
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To demonstrate the seed dormancy and germination characters of Robinia pseudoacacia L., an exotic tall tree species in Japan, we applied scarification, cold stratification, diurnal thermal regime, heat shock, and/or winter weathering treatments to the seeds. These characters differed markedly among three seed sources (Trees K, B, and I). Scarification revealed that most seeds from Tree K showed physical dormancy, whereas those from Tree B had no physical dormancy. The seeds from Tree I showed weak physical dormancy so that the seeds eventually germinate without any treatments as time goes by. The physical dormancy in Tree K was broken by a long, high heat shock treatment. The results imply that seeds from Tree K respond to fire in natural conditions. Seeds from Tree I responded to a wide range of thermal regimes, except for long, high heat shock. In contrast, most seeds from Tree B absorbed water during cold stratification and some germinated. However, many seeds from Tree B died in the soil during the winter, presumably because of microbial and fungal infections. Seeds from Trees I and B acquired physical dormancy by weathering during the winter, implying that seedpods that remain in the crown function as an aerial seed bank. R. pseudoacacia may be able to produce various levels in dormancy with respect to the winter condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree K seeds mostly showed physical dormancy, whereas Tree B seeds did not.

Taxon
Tree Ke0
Outcome
physical dormancye0
Comparator
Tree Be0

Verbatim

e0

“Scarification revealed that most seeds from Tree K showed physical dormancy, whereas those from Tree B had no physical dormancy.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 340–468 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree I seeds had weak physical dormancy and eventually germinated untreated.

Taxon
Tree Ie0
Outcome
weak physical dormancye0

Verbatim

e0

“The seeds from Tree I showed weak physical dormancy so that the seeds eventually germinate without any treatments as time goes by.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 469–599 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Long high heat shock broke physical dormancy in Tree K seeds.

Taxon
Robinia pseudoacaciaL.Robinia pseudoacaciat0
Material
Tree Ke0
Treatment
long, high heat shock treatmente0
Outcome
physical dormancye0
Direction
brokene0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Robinia pseudoacacia
Robinia pseudoacacia · TaxonAnnabell Hormann / korina.info · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The physical dormancy in Tree K was broken by a long, high heat shock treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 600–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“Robinia pseudoacaciaL.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tree I seeds responded across thermal regimes except long high heat shock.

Taxon
Tree Ie0
Outcome
responded to a wide range of thermal regimese0

Verbatim

e0

“Seeds from Tree I responded to a wide range of thermal regimes, except for long, high heat shock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–858 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most Tree B seeds absorbed water in cold stratification and some germinated.

Taxon
Tree Be0
Treatment
cold stratificatione0
Outcome
absorbed watere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“most seeds from Tree B absorbed water during cold stratification and some germinated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–957 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Many Tree B seeds died in soil during winter, possibly from infections.

Taxon
Tree Be0
Outcome
seeds from Tree B diede0
Qualifier
presumably because of microbial and fungal infectionse0

Verbatim

e0

“many seeds from Tree B died in the soil during the winter, presumably because of microbial and fungal infections.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1080 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter weathering induced physical dormancy in Tree I and B seeds.

Taxon
Trees I and Be0
Treatment
weathering during the wintere0
Outcome
physical dormancye0
Direction
acquirede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Seeds from Trees I and B acquired physical dormancy by weathering during the winter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1164 · show in text ↑

heat · growth · Robinia pseudoacacia (black locust)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.