Paper · 1989 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

INFLUENCE OF FALL AND SPRING HERBICIDE APPLICATION ON WINTER WHEAT (Triticum aestivum L. ’NORSTAR’)

D. A. DERKSEN; K. J. KIRKLAND; B. R. McLENNAN; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
9
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Recommendations regarding the timing of herbicide application in winter wheat vary among production areas. The current increase in area of winter wheat production in Saskatchewan warrants an examination of herbicide recommendations for this non-traditional production area. Field research was conducted for 2 yr at several locations in Saskatchewan using 2,4-D, MCPA, dicamba, bromoxynil, chlorsulfuron, and clopyralid, applied in the late fall or early spring, to determine the effects of time and rate of application on winter wheat grain yield. Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ’Norstar’) was tolerant to fall application of all herbicides at rates recommended for spring application. Grain yield was reduced in some cases when double the recommended spring rate of 2,4-D, MCPA, bromoxynil, and clopyralid was applied in the fall. Spring application of clopyralid resulted in significantly lower grain yield than fall application. All herbicides tested show potential for use in winter wheat production, although caution is warranted for spring application of clopyralid.Key words: Wheat (winter), 2,4-D, MCPA, dicamba, bromoxynil, chlorsulfuron

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat tolerated fall application of all tested herbicides at spring recommended rates.

Taxon
Triticum aestivum L.Triticum aestivume0
Material
Norstare0
Treatment
fall application of all herbicides at rates recommended for spring applicatione0
Outcome
tolerante0
Setting
Saskatchewant0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. ’Norstar’) was tolerant to fall application of all herbicides at rates recommended for spring application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“several locations in Saskatchewan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–348 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double rate fall 2,4-D reduced grain yield in some cases.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
double the recommended spring rate of 2,4-De0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in some casese0
Comparator
recommended spring ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was reduced in some cases when double the recommended spring rate of 2,4-D, MCPA, bromoxynil, and clopyralid was applied in the fall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double rate fall MCPA reduced grain yield in some cases.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
MCPAe0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in some casese0
Comparator
recommended spring ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was reduced in some cases when double the recommended spring rate of 2,4-D, MCPA, bromoxynil, and clopyralid was applied in the fall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double rate fall bromoxynil reduced grain yield in some cases.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
bromoxynile0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in some casese0
Comparator
recommended spring ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was reduced in some cases when double the recommended spring rate of 2,4-D, MCPA, bromoxynil, and clopyralid was applied in the fall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Double rate fall clopyralid reduced grain yield in some cases.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
clopyralide0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in some casese0
Comparator
recommended spring ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield was reduced in some cases when double the recommended spring rate of 2,4-D, MCPA, bromoxynil, and clopyralid was applied in the fall.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 690–835 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring clopyralid significantly lowered grain yield compared with fall application.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Spring application of clopyralide0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
fall applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spring application of clopyralid resulted in significantly lower grain yield than fall application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 836–935 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude all tested herbicides have potential for winter wheat production.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Outcome
potential for use in winter wheat productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All herbicides tested show potential for use in winter wheat production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1007 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors urge caution with spring clopyralid application.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
caution is warranted for spring application of clopyralide0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“caution is warranted for spring application of clopyralid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–66 · show in text ↑

clopyralid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

6 papers: 1 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 78 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

3,5-dibromo-4-hydroxybenzonitrile · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 10 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 14 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

herbicide · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 18 positive, 11 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.