Paper · 1991 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Residue analysis of garlic (Allium sativum L.) cloves following a postemergence application of linuron

A. J. Cessna

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In a 2-yr residue study, garlic (Allium sativum L.) was grown in weed-free field plots of clay loam soil and treated at the three-leaf growth stage of the crop with postemergence applications of linuron at 2.2 kg ha −1 . The plots were irrigated in the 2nd year of the study. At harvest, the bulbs were cured in the field for 2 wk. Residues of linuron were not detected in cloves of mature bulbs from either year. Key words: Linuron, garlic, residues, HPLC, postemergence application

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Linuron residues were undetectable in mature garlic cloves in both years.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Organ / stage
cloves of mature bulbse0
Treatment
postemergence application of linuront0
Outcome
Residues of linurone0
Qualifier
either yeare0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Residues of linuron were not detected in cloves of mature bulbs from either year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–413 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic (Allium sativum L.) cloves following a postemergence application of linuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–102 · show in text ↑

herbicide · molecular: metabolites · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.