Paper · 1973 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Performance of Sulfur‐Coated Urea Under Intermittently Flooded Rice Culture in Peru

P. A. Sanchez; A. Gavidia O.; G. E. Ramirez; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Short‐statured, high yielding rice ( Oryza sativa L.) varieties grown extensively in northern Peru require extremely high rates of conventional N sources to achieve maximum yields. The recovery of applied N is extremely low due to the use of intermittent flooding. This water management system results in heavy N losses even with properly timed split applications. In search of simpler and more efficient methods of N management, eight field experiments were conducted in the region to evaluate sulfur‐coated urea (SCU), an experimental, slow‐release N sources supplied by the Tennessee Valley Authority. Rice yields were increased an average of 59% more by pretransplant‐incorporated SCU than by urea or ammonium sulfate applied in the same manner. SCU produced an average of 20% higher grain yield response than topdressed applications of urea or ammonium sulfate. SCU applications increased panicle production, N uptake at harvest, and the apparent recovery of added N. Beneficial effects of SCU were more pronounced in sites where check yields were low, especially less than about 4.8 ton/ha. In sites with high N supplying capacity, SCU produced excessive vegetative growth which resulted in yield reductions at high N rates. Regardless of an assumed 48%‐higher unit N cost in SCU, the overall benefits of pretransplant‐incorporated applications of SCU were favorable since there was a decrease of 40% in the optimum rate of N and the need for precise timing of application was eliminated.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pretransplant incorporated SCU increased yield response 59% more than incorporated urea or ammonium sulfate.

Treatment
pretransplant‐incorporated SCUe0
Outcome
Rice yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
59%e0
Comparator
urea or ammonium sulfate applied in the same mannere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Rice yields were increased an average of 59% more by pretransplant‐incorporated SCU than by urea or ammonium sulfate applied in the same manner.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 614–758 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCU produced 20% higher grain yield response than topdressed urea or ammonium sulfate.

Treatment
SCUe0
Outcome
grain yield responsee0
Direction
highere0
Value
20%e0
Comparator
topdressed applications of urea or ammonium sulfatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SCU produced an average of 20% higher grain yield response than topdressed applications of urea or ammonium sulfate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–875 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCU increased panicle production.

Treatment
SCU applicationse0
Outcome
panicle productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SCU applications increased panicle production, N uptake at harvest, and the apparent recovery of added N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCU increased nitrogen uptake at harvest.

Treatment
SCU applicationse0
Outcome
N uptake at harveste0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SCU applications increased panicle production, N uptake at harvest, and the apparent recovery of added N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCU increased apparent recovery of added nitrogen.

Treatment
SCU applicationse0
Outcome
apparent recovery of added Ne0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SCU applications increased panicle production, N uptake at harvest, and the apparent recovery of added N.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–981 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCU benefits were more pronounced where check yields were below about 4.8 ton/ha.

Outcome
Beneficial effects of SCUe0
Direction
more pronouncede0
Qualifier
less than about 4.8 ton/hae0
Setting
sitese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beneficial effects of SCU were more pronounced in sites where check yields were low, especially less than about 4.8 ton/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1105 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high nitrogen rates in high nitrogen supplying sites, SCU produced excessive vegetative growth.

Treatment
SCUe0
Outcome
excessive vegetative growthe0
Direction
excessivee0
Setting
sites with high N supplying capacitye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In sites with high N supplying capacity, SCU produced excessive vegetative growth which resulted in yield reductions at high N rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high nitrogen rates in high nitrogen supplying sites, SCU reduced yield.

Treatment
SCUe0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Qualifier
at high N ratese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In sites with high N supplying capacity, SCU produced excessive vegetative growth which resulted in yield reductions at high N rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1106–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCU lowered the optimum nitrogen rate by 40%.

Treatment
pretransplant‐incorporated applications of SCUe0
Outcome
optimum rate of Ne0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
40%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of an assumed 48%‐higher unit N cost in SCU, the overall benefits of pretransplant‐incorporated applications of SCU were favorable since there was a decrease of 40% in the optimum rate of N and the need for precise timing of application was eliminated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SCU removed the need for precise application timing.

Treatment
pretransplant‐incorporated applications of SCUe0
Outcome
need for precise timing of applicatione0
Direction
eliminatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of an assumed 48%‐higher unit N cost in SCU, the overall benefits of pretransplant‐incorporated applications of SCU were favorable since there was a decrease of 40% in the optimum rate of N and the need for precise timing of application was eliminated.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1503 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–67 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

511 papers: 402 positive, 109 negative or no effect

108 papers in the same direction as this paper · 402 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.