Paper · 1966 · Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry

The effect of trifluralin on the root development of seedling cotton

BB Fischer

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
12
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Trifluralin (2, 6 dinitrc-N N-dipropyl-4-trifluoro-methylaniline) severely retarded the secondary root development of seedling cotton at very low concentrations in water, sand, and soil culture in the glass house. Although retarded, the seedlings survived at concentrations of 5.0 p.p.m., the highest rate used. In water culture length of secondary roots was reduced at 0.01 p.p.m. In sand culture a concentration of 0.125 p.p.m. significantly reduced the root weight, but in clay-loam soil a concentration of 0.25 p.p.m. was needed to produce the same degree of reduced secondary root growth. No statistically significant retardation in total root growth was obtained when the cotton roots were able to grow in an untreated layer of sand or clay-loam soil, when the trifluralin treated layer was placed either above or below the untreated layer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin severely retarded secondary root development in cotton seedlings across water, sand and soil culture.

Treatment
Trifluraline0
Outcome
secondary root developmente0
Direction
retardede0
Setting
glass housee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Trifluralin (2, 6 dinitrc-N N-dipropyl-4-trifluoro-methylaniline) severely retarded the secondary root development of seedling cotton at very low concentrations in water, sand, and soil culture in the glass house.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–213 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton seedlings survived trifluralin at 5.0 p.p.m.

Outcome
seedlings survivede0
Value
5.0 p.p.m.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the seedlings survived at concentrations of 5.0 p.p.m., the highest rate used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–311 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In water culture, trifluralin reduced secondary root length at 0.01 p.p.m.

Treatment
0.01 p.p.m.e0
Outcome
length of secondary rootse0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
water culturee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In water culture length of secondary roots was reduced at 0.01 p.p.m.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–381 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In sand culture, trifluralin significantly reduced root weight at 0.125 p.p.m.

Treatment
0.125 p.p.m.e0
Outcome
root weighte0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
sand culturee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In sand culture a concentration of 0.125 p.p.m. significantly reduced the root weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–467 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In clay-loam soil, 0.25 p.p.m. trifluralin reduced secondary root growth.

Treatment
0.25 p.p.m.e0
Outcome
secondary root growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
clay-loam soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in clay-loam soil a concentration of 0.25 p.p.m. was needed to produce the same degree of reduced secondary root growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–593 · show in text ↑
t0

“cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

A trifluralin-treated layer above untreated substrate did not significantly retard total cotton root growth.

Treatment
trifluralin treated layere0
Outcome
total root growthe0
Direction
retardatione0
Comparator
untreated layere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No statistically significant retardation in total root growth was obtained when the cotton roots were able to grow in an untreated layer of sand or clay-loam soil, when the trifluralin treated layer was placed either above or below the untreated layer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–846 · show in text ↑

trifluralin · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 1 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.