Paper · 2014 · SAARC Journal of Agriculture

Nutrient Budgeting, Economics and Energetics of Cowpea under Potassium and Phosphorus Management

VK Choudhary; P Suresh Kumar

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Low availability of phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) in acidic soil is a major constraint for crop production. Cowpea was grown under split-plot design with three levels of K and P (viz., 100%, 75% and 50% of recommended dose). Green pod and stover yield was 20.9 and 16.9% higher with 100% K over 50% K application. Similarly, 100% P had 20.2% higher green pod and 16.6% higher stover yield over 50% P. Production efficiency was found higher with 100% K and P (48.6 and 49.0 kg ha-1 day-1 respectively) followed by 75% K. The actual gain of N, P and K, and balance were higher with the increase of K and P levels but reverse in case of gross and net return, and BCR. The energy productivity and energy use efficiency were higher on 100% K and P. Cowpea on acid soil along with 100% recommended dose of 40 kg K and 60 kg P ha-1 showed highest yield along with soil fertility restoration as well as reduced the cost of inorganic fertilizer, higher BCR (1.89) and energy requirement. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/sja.v11i2.18408 SAARC J. Agri., 11(2): 129-140(2013)

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full K raised green pod yield 20.9% over half K.

Treatment
100% Ke0
Outcome
Green pode0
Direction
highere0
Value
20.9e0
Comparator
50% Ke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Green pod and stover yield was 20.9 and 16.9% higher with 100% K over 50% K application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full K raised stover yield 16.9% over half K.

Treatment
100% Ke0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.9%e0
Comparator
50% Ke0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Green pod and stover yield was 20.9 and 16.9% higher with 100% K over 50% K application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–315 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full P raised green pod yield 20.2% over half P.

Treatment
100% Pe0
Outcome
green pode0
Direction
highere0
Value
20.2%e0
Comparator
50% Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“100% P had 20.2% higher green pod and 16.6% higher stover yield over 50% P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–402 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Full P raised stover yield 16.6% over half P.

Treatment
100% Pe0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.6%e0
Comparator
50% Pe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“100% P had 20.2% higher green pod and 16.6% higher stover yield over 50% P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 328–402 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Production efficiency at full K was 48.6 kg ha-1 day-1.

Treatment
100% Ke0
Outcome
Production efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
48.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Production efficiency was found higher with 100% K and P (48.6 and 49.0 kg ha-1 day-1 respectively) followed by 75% K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–521 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Production efficiency at full P was 49.0 kg ha-1 day-1.

Treatment
100% K and Pe0
Outcome
Production efficiencye0
Direction
highere0
Value
49.0 kg ha-1 day-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Production efficiency was found higher with 100% K and P (48.6 and 49.0 kg ha-1 day-1 respectively) followed by 75% K”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 404–521 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N, P and K gains and balances rose with K and P levels.

Treatment
K and P levelse0
Outcome
actual gain of N, P and K, and balancee0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“The actual gain of N, P and K, and balance were higher with the increase of K and P levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–613 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gross and net return and BCR moved opposite to rising K and P levels.

Outcome
gross and net return, and BCRe0
Qualifier
reversee0

Not reportedTreatmentDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“reverse in case of gross and net return, and BCR”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–666 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Energy productivity and use efficiency were higher at full K and P.

Treatment
100% K and Pe0
Outcome
energy productivity and energy use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“The energy productivity and energy use efficiency were higher on 100% K and P”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 668–745 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The full 40 kg K and 60 kg P ha-1 rates gave highest yield, restored soil fertility, reduced fertilizer cost, and had BCR 1.89.

Treatment
100% recommended dose of 40 kg K and 60 kg P ha-1e0
Outcome
highest yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.89e0
Setting
acid soile0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–54 · show in text ↑
e0

“Cowpea on acid soil along with 100% recommended dose of 40 kg K and 60 kg P ha-1 showed highest yield along with soil fertility restoration as well as reduced the cost of inorganic fertilizer, higher BCR (1.89) and energy requirement”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 747–980 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Results differ

113 papers: 107 positive, 6 negative or no effect

106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

109 papers more in this group

See all 113 papers →

potassium · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 32 positive, 1 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.