Paper · 2003 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Effect of Selected Mycorrhizal Inoculation on Phosphorus Sustainability in Sterile and Non‐sterile Soils in the Harran Plain in South Anatolia

Ibrahim Ortas

12
claims
29
verbatim quotes
90
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The Southeastern Anatolian Project (SAP, Turkish acronym GAP) is the largest irrigation and development project of Turkey covering about two million ha cultivated land. A number of field experiments in the region with different crops including maize, wheat, and cotton, have repeatedly shown that increased applications of phosphorus (P) fertilizers (i.e., from 0 kg P2O5 ha−1 up to 200 kg P2O5 ha−1) do not lead to any effects on crop yield in soils with low plant available P concentration. The aim of the research was to determine the potential effect of indigenous mycorrhiza and selected mycorrhiza species on plant growth and nutrient uptake under sterile and non‐sterile soil conditions. The preliminary results led us to study the effect of indigenous mycorrhizae potential on the growth of plants and P nutrition in a representative soil from the GAP under greenhouse conditions. Using inoculation of three different mycorrhizae species (Glomus caledonium, G. etunicatum, and G. mossea) maize plants were grown with increasing P [0 (P1), 25 (P2), 125 (P3) mg P kg−1 soil] supply in soils with and without sterilization. At the lowest P supply, shoot dry matter production was significantly depressed. This decreasing effect of low P supply was particularly obvious when soils were sterilized and not inoculated with mycorrhizae. Inoculation of soil with mycorrhizae species significantly increased plant growth and P uptake of plants, especially under low P supply and soil sterilization. In all experiments, plants grown on non‐sterile soil grew much better than on sterilized soils. However, mycorrhizal dependencies of plant grow in sterile soil is higher than that in non‐sterile soil. Among the mycorrhizae species, G. caledonium was the most effective on plant growth, P uptake and mycorrhizal dependency. In low P application, plant roots were strongly infected and consequently increased plant growth, but in high P level application there was a slight reduction in root infection. The results show that mycorrhizal inoculation is an effective practice for improving crop production in P deficient soils. Also there was a potential effect of indigenous mycorrhizal fungi spores in the soil series of the Harran Plain that successfully infected the plant roots. It has been concluded that soil and crop management can help to get maximum benefit from indigenous mycorrhiza for sustainable P management.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowest phosphorus supply significantly depressed maize shoot dry matter.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
lowest P supplye0
Outcome
shoot dry matter productione0
Direction
depressede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At the lowest P supply, shoot dry matter production was significantly depressed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1217 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1017 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The reduction under low phosphorus was especially apparent in sterilized soil without mycorrhizal inoculation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
decreasing effect of low P supplye0
Direction
decreasinge0
Qualifier
soils were sterilized and not inoculated with mycorrhizaee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This decreasing effect of low P supply was particularly obvious when soils were sterilized and not inoculated with mycorrhizae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1345 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased maize growth, particularly with low phosphorus and sterilization.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Inoculation of soil with mycorrhizae speciese0
Interactor
mycorrhizae speciese0symbionte2
Outcome
plant growthe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
low P supply and soil sterilizatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of soil with mycorrhizae species significantly increased plant growth and P uptake of plants, especially under low P supply and soil sterilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1505 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1017 · show in text ↑
e2

“Inoculation of soil with mycorrhizae species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal inoculation significantly increased maize phosphorus uptake, particularly with low phosphorus and sterilization.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
Inoculation of soil with mycorrhizae speciese0
Interactor
mycorrhizae speciese0symbionte2
Outcome
P uptake of plantse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
low P supply and soil sterilizatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of soil with mycorrhizae species significantly increased plant growth and P uptake of plants, especially under low P supply and soil sterilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1505 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1017 · show in text ↑
e2

“Inoculation of soil with mycorrhizae species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1347–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maize grew much better in nonsterile than sterilized soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
non‐sterile soile0
Outcome
grewe0
Direction
much bettere0
Comparator
sterilized soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants grown on non‐sterile soil grew much better than on sterilized soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1601 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1017 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal dependence of maize growth was higher in sterile than nonsterile soil.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
mycorrhizal dependencies of plant growe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
non‐sterile soile0
Setting
sterile soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mycorrhizal dependencies of plant grow in sterile soil is higher than that in non‐sterile soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1706 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1017 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

G. caledonium was the most effective mycorrhizal species for maize growth, phosphorus uptake and mycorrhizal dependence.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
G. caledoniumFunneliformis caledoniume0symbionte2
Outcome
plant growth, P uptake and mycorrhizal dependencye0
Direction
most effectivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“G. caledonium was the most effective on plant growth, P uptake and mycorrhizal dependency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1739–1828 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1017 · show in text ↑
e2

“G. caledonium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1739–1752 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low phosphorus application produced strong maize root infection by mycorrhizae.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
low P applicatione0
Outcome
plant roots were strongly infectede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In low P application, plant roots were strongly infected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1830–1886 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At high phosphorus application, maize root infection was slightly reduced.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
high P level applicatione0
Outcome
root infectione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in high P level application there was a slight reduction in root infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1932–2006 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1017 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Indigenous mycorrhizal spores from Harran Plain soils infected maize roots.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
indigenous mycorrhizal fungie0symbionte2
Outcome
infected the plant rootse0
Setting
Harran Plaine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“indigenous mycorrhizal fungi spores in the soil series of the Harran Plain that successfully infected the plant roots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2168–2285 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1017 · show in text ↑
e2

“indigenous mycorrhizal fungi”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2168–2196 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that mycorrhizal inoculation can improve crop production in phosphorus deficient soils.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Interactor
mycorrhizale0symbionte2
Outcome
improving crop production in P deficient soilse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mycorrhizal inoculation is an effective practice for improving crop production in P deficient soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2129 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1017 · show in text ↑
e2

“mycorrhizal inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2030–2053 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommended soil and crop management to maximize indigenous mycorrhizal benefit for sustainable phosphorus management.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Outcome
maximum benefit from indigenous mycorrhiza for sustainable P managemente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil and crop management can help to get maximum benefit from indigenous mycorrhiza for sustainable P management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2314–2426 · show in text ↑
e1

“maize plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1005–1017 · show in text ↑

mycorrhiza · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

122 papers: 116 positive, 6 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

118 papers more in this group

See all 122 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

188 papers: 169 positive, 19 negative or no effect

168 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

184 papers more in this group

See all 188 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

306 papers: 288 positive, 18 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

302 papers more in this group

See all 306 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

627 papers: 549 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 549 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

623 papers more in this group

See all 627 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.