Paper · 2009 · Journal of Plant Registrations

Registration of ‘USG 3555’ Wheat

C. A. Griffey; W. E. Thomason; R. M. Pitman; et al.

12
claims
36
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

‘USG 3555’ (Reg. No. CV‐1037, PI 654454) soft red winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), developed and tested as VA02W‐555 by the Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station, was released in March 2007. USG 3555 was derived from the cross VA94‐52‐60/Pioneer Brand ‘2643’ //‘USG 3209’. USG 3555 is a high‐yielding, moderately early heading, awnletted, short stature, semidwarf ( Rht2 ), cultivar that is resistant to powdery mildew [ Blumeria graminis (DC.) E.O. Speer], stripe rust ( Puccinia striiformis Westend.), and stem rust ( Puccinia graminis Pers.:Pers. f. sp. tritici Eriks. & E. Henn.). In Virginia average grain yield (2006– 2008) of USG 3555 (6114 kg ha −1 ) has been equal to that of the highest‐yielding cultivars. In USDA–ARS uniform nursery trials conducted at 27 locations in 2005 and at 26 locations in 2006, USG 3555 produced average grain yields of 5651 and 5530 kg ha −1 , respectively, in comparison to nursery mean yields of 4959 kg ha −1 in 2005 and 4878 kg ha −1 in 2006. Milling and baking quality of USG 3555 exceeds that of its parent USG 3209. On an Allis Chalmers Mill, grain of USG 3555 has higher break flour yields (305 vs. 283 g kg −1 ), softer texture (lower endosperm separation index scores 9.98 vs. 10.62), lower sucrose solvent retention capacity (98.6 vs. 104 g 100 g −1 ), and larger cookie diameters (17.1 vs. 16.8 cm).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG 3555 is high yielding, early heading, awnletted, short and semidwarf.

Material
USG 3555e0
Gene
Rht2e0
Outcome
high‐yielding, moderately early heading, awnletted, short stature, semidwarfe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“USG 3555 is a high‐yielding, moderately early heading, awnletted, short stature, semidwarf ( Rht2 ), cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 281–390 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“USG 3555”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG 3555 resists powdery mildew.

Interactor
Blumeria graminisBlumeria graminise0pathogen
Outcome
resistant to powdery mildewe0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Blumeria graminis
Blumeria graminis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resistant to powdery mildew [ Blumeria graminis (DC.) E.O. Speer]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–464 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“USG 3555”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG 3555 resists stripe rust.

Interactor
Puccinia striiformisPuccinia striiformise0pathogen
Outcome
stripe ruste0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia striiformis
Puccinia striiformis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stripe rust ( Puccinia striiformis Westend.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–510 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“USG 3555”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG 3555 resists stem rust.

Interactor
Puccinia graminisPuccinia graminise0pathogen
Outcome
stem ruste0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia graminis
Puccinia graminis · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“stem rust ( Puccinia graminis Pers.:Pers. f. sp. tritici Eriks. & E. Henn.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–591 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“USG 3555”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Virginia, its mean grain yield equaled that of the top yielding cultivars.

Material
USG 3555e0
Outcome
average grain yielde0
Direction
equale0
Value
6114 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
highest‐yielding cultivarse0
Setting
Virginiae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In Virginia average grain yield (2006– 2008) of USG 3555 (6114 kg ha −1 ) has been equal to that of the highest‐yielding cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“USG 3555”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG 3555 yielded 5651 kg ha −1 in 2005, above the nursery mean.

Material
USG 3555e0
Outcome
average grain yieldse0
Value
5651e0
Qualifier
in 2005e0
Comparator
nursery mean yieldse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“USG 3555 produced average grain yields of 5651 and 5530 kg ha −1 , respectively, in comparison to nursery mean yields of 4959 kg ha −1 in 2005 and 4878 kg ha −1 in 2006.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“USG 3555”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG 3555 yielded 5530 kg ha −1 in 2006, above the nursery mean.

Material
USG 3555e0
Outcome
average grain yieldse0
Value
5530 kg ha −1e0
Qualifier
in 2006e0
Comparator
nursery mean yieldse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“USG 3555 produced average grain yields of 5651 and 5530 kg ha −1 , respectively, in comparison to nursery mean yields of 4959 kg ha −1 in 2005 and 4878 kg ha −1 in 2006.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“USG 3555”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG 3555 had better milling and baking quality than USG 3209.

Material
USG 3555e0
Outcome
Milling and baking qualitye0
Direction
exceedse0
Comparator
USG 3209e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Milling and baking quality of USG 3555 exceeds that of its parent USG 3209.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“USG 3555”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG 3555 had higher break flour yields than USG 3209.

Material
USG 3555t1
Outcome
break flour yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
305e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher break flour yields (305 vs. 283 g kg −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1166 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“USG 3555”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG 3555 had softer texture than USG 3209.

Material
USG 3555t1
Outcome
texturee0
Direction
softere0
Value
9.98e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“softer texture (lower endosperm separation index scores 9.98 vs. 10.62)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1239 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“USG 3555”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG 3555 had lower sucrose solvent retention capacity.

Material
USG 3555t1
Outcome
sucrose solvent retention capacitye0
Direction
lowere0
Value
98.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower sucrose solvent retention capacity (98.6 vs. 104 g 100 g −1 )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1241–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“USG 3555”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–25 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

USG 3555 produced larger cookie diameters.

Material
USG 3555t1
Outcome
cookie diameterse0
Direction
largere0
Value
17.1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“larger cookie diameters (17.1 vs. 16.8 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1314–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–32 · show in text ↑
t1

“USG 3555”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–25 · show in text ↑