Paper · 1998 · Australian Journal of Soil Research

Effects of spent mushroom substrate on soil chemical conditions and plant growth in an intensive horticultural system: a comparison with inorganic fertiliser

D. P. C. Stewart; K. C. Cameron; I. S. Cornforth

10
claims
26
verbatim quotes
41
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Between November 1991 and 1993, 4 consecutive vegetable crops (sweetcorn, cabbage, potato, and cabbage) were grown in Lincoln, New Zealand. The treatments included spent mushroom substrate (SMS, a by-product of the mushroom industry) applications before each crop at rates of 0, 20, 40, or 80 t/ha (moist), both with and without 1 rate of inorganic fertiliser for each crop (120-338, 40-100, 53-100, and 60-114 kg/ha, respectively, of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, and sulfur). SMS applications caused a rapid increase in soil inorganic N concentration, but after this it had a variable effect. There was some evidence of N immobilisation following initial SMS applications of 20 t/ha. SMS applications increased both soil pH and CEC, whereas inorganic fertiliser decreased both. Sweetcorn and cabbage yields were increased by SMS when inorganic fertiliser was not used, and potato yield was increased irrespective of fertiliser use (i.e. yield increases of 38%, 82-96%, and 26-46%, respectively, for sweetcorn cob, cabbage head, and potato tuber fresh yields). Inorganic fertiliser increased crop yields by a greater amount than SMS. A lack of soil inorganic N was the major limitation to crop growth following SMS applications, so crops may require additional N with SMS.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMS rapidly increased soil inorganic nitrogen.

Treatment
SMS applicationse0
Outcome
soil inorganic N concentratione0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“SMS applications caused a rapid increase in soil inorganic N concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–555 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

There was evidence of nitrogen immobilization after initial 20 t/ha SMS applications.

Treatment
SMS applications of 20 t/hae0
Outcome
N immobilisatione0
Qualifier
some evidencee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“There was some evidence of N immobilisation following initial SMS applications of 20 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMS increased soil pH and CEC.

Treatment
SMS applicationse0
Outcome
soil pH and CECe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
inorganic fertilisere0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“SMS applications increased both soil pH and CEC, whereas inorganic fertiliser decreased both.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer decreased soil pH and CEC.

Treatment
inorganic fertilisere0
Outcome
soil pH and CECe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
SMS applicationse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“SMS applications increased both soil pH and CEC, whereas inorganic fertiliser decreased both.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–782 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMS increased sweetcorn cob yield by 38% without inorganic fertilizer.

Taxon
Sweetcorne0
Treatment
SMSe0
Outcome
sweetcorn cobe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
38%e0
Qualifier
inorganic fertiliser was not usede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Sweetcorn and cabbage yields were increased by SMS when inorganic fertiliser was not used, and potato yield was increased irrespective of fertiliser use (i.e. yield increases of 38%, 82-96%, and 26-46%, respectively, for sweetcorn cob, cabbage head, and potato tuber fresh yields).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMS increased cabbage head yield by 82-96% without inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
SMSe0
Outcome
cabbage heade0
Direction
increasede0
Value
82-96%e0
Qualifier
inorganic fertiliser was not usede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sweetcorn and cabbage yields were increased by SMS when inorganic fertiliser was not used, and potato yield was increased irrespective of fertiliser use (i.e. yield increases of 38%, 82-96%, and 26-46%, respectively, for sweetcorn cob, cabbage head, and potato tuber fresh yields).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 783–1064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SMS increased potato tuber yield by 26-46% regardless of inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
spent mushroom substratet1
Outcome
potato tuber fresh yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26-46%e0
Qualifier
irrespective of fertiliser usee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum tuberosum
Solanum tuberosum · TaxonScott Bauer, USDA ARS · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“potato yield was increased irrespective of fertiliser use (i.e. yield increases of 38%, 82-96%, and 26-46%, respectively, for sweetcorn cob, cabbage head, and potato tuber fresh yields).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“spent mushroom substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–35 · show in text ↑
t1

“spent mushroom substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–35 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer increased crop yields more than SMS.

Taxon
plantt0
Treatment
Inorganic fertilisere0
Outcome
crop yieldse0
Direction
greater amounte0
Comparator
SMSe0

Verbatim

e0

“Inorganic fertiliser increased crop yields by a greater amount than SMS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1137 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lack of soil inorganic nitrogen was the main limitation to crop growth after SMS.

Taxon
plantt0
Treatment
SMS applicationse0
Outcome
crop growthe0
Qualifier
A lack of soil inorganic Ne0

Verbatim

e0

“A lack of soil inorganic N was the major limitation to crop growth following SMS applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1231 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Crops may need extra nitrogen with SMS.

Taxon
plantt0
Outcome
may require additional N with SMSe0

Verbatim

e0

“crops may require additional N with SMS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1276 · show in text ↑
t0

“plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑
t1

“plant growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–80 · show in text ↑

growing medium · yield · Solanum tuberosum (potato)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 17 positive, 3 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.