Paper · 1993 · International Journal of Pest Management

Tolerance of different host‐plants to the cassava mealybugPhenacoccus manihotiMatile‐Ferrero (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae)

B. Le RÜ; M. Tertuliano

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
17
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The tolerance of seven varieties of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz), Poinsettia (Euphorbia pulcherrima Wild.), Talinum (Talinum triangulare Jacq.) and Faux‐caoutchouc (a hybrid of M. esculenta and M. glaziovii Mull. Arg.) to the cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Matt. Ferr., was measured in the laboratory, by quantifying morphological and physiological changes in the growth of plants infested with P. manihoti. A 2‐month infestation by 100 mealybugs decreased the total leaf area and the leaf area ratio F but did not modify total dry weight, relative growth rate R or net assimilation rate E of plants studied. The decrease in leaf area was extremely variable and depended on plant species and variety. The effect of infestation on dry weight of different plant organs was not homogeneous, suggesting that translocation of nutrients made during photosynthesis was modified. In cassava the decrease in leaf area, without significant change in leaf dry weight, appeared to be due to physiological changes in plants similar to those induced by water stress. The degree of tolerance was not related to the plant species (cassava varieties Ganfo, Incoza and Zanaga were as tolerant as Talinum and Faux‐caoutchouc). Keywords: Phenacoccus manihoticassavainsect‐plant relationshipantibiosistolerancevarietal resistanceCongo

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A two-month infestation by 100 mealybugs decreased host plant total leaf area and leaf area ratio.

Treatment
2‐month infestation by 100 mealybugse0
Interactor
Phenacoccus manihotiPhenacoccus manihotie1pest
Outcome
total leaf area and the leaf area ratio Fe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Phenacoccus manihoti
Phenacoccus manihoti · InteractorMJN2000 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 2‐month infestation by 100 mealybugs decreased the total leaf area and the leaf area ratio F but did not modify total dry weight, relative growth rate R or net assimilation rate E of plants studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–630 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Matt. Ferr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–290 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation did not modify plant total dry weight, relative growth rate or net assimilation rate.

Treatment
2‐month infestation by 100 mealybugse0
Interactor
Phenacoccus manihotiPhenacoccus manihotie1pest
Outcome
total dry weight, relative growth rate R or net assimilation rate Ee0
Direction
did not modifye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Phenacoccus manihoti
Phenacoccus manihoti · InteractorMJN2000 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A 2‐month infestation by 100 mealybugs decreased the total leaf area and the leaf area ratio F but did not modify total dry weight, relative growth rate R or net assimilation rate E of plants studied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–630 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Matt. Ferr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–290 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The leaf area decrease varied by plant species and variety.

Material
seven varietiese1
Outcome
decrease in leaf areae0
Qualifier
extremely variablee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The decrease in leaf area was extremely variable and depended on plant species and variety.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–722 · show in text ↑
e1

“seven varieties of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Infestation effects on dry weight differed among plant organs.

Organ / stage
different plant organse0
Treatment
infestatione0
Outcome
dry weight of different plant organse0
Direction
not homogeneouse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of infestation on dry weight of different plant organs was not homogeneous, suggesting that translocation of nutrients made during photosynthesis was modified.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–893 · show in text ↑
e1

“seven varieties of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 26–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cassava leaf area declined without a significant change in leaf dry weight.

Treatment
infested with P. manihotie2
Interactor
Phenacoccus manihotiPhenacoccus manihotie1pest
Outcome
leaf dry weighte0
Direction
without significant changee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Phenacoccus manihoti
Phenacoccus manihoti · InteractorMJN2000 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In cassava the decrease in leaf area, without significant change in leaf dry weight, appeared to be due to physiological changes in plants similar to those induced by water stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1074 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Matt. Ferr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–290 · show in text ↑
e2

“plants infested with P. manihoti”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 396–428 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tolerance to the mealybug was unrelated to plant species.

Material
cassava varieties Ganfo, Incoza and Zanagae0
Interactor
Phenacoccus manihotiPhenacoccus manihotie1pest
Outcome
degree of tolerancee0
Direction
not relatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Phenacoccus manihoti
Phenacoccus manihoti · InteractorMJN2000 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The degree of tolerance was not related to the plant species (cassava varieties Ganfo, Incoza and Zanaga were as tolerant as Talinum and Faux‐caoutchouc).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1075–1229 · show in text ↑
e1

“cassava mealybug Phenacoccus manihoti Matt. Ferr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–290 · show in text ↑

Phenacoccus manihoti · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

infection · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

7 papers: 0 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.