Paper · 2003 · Phytopathology

Induction of Chitinase, β-1,3-Glucanase, and Phenylalanine Ammonia Lyase in Peach Fruit by UV-C Treatment

Ahmed El Ghaouth; Charles L. Wilson; Ann M. Callahan

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
107
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Treatment of peach fruit with UV-C light caused a rapid induction of chitinase, beta-1,3-glucanase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activities starting 6 h after treatment and reaching maximum levels at 96 h after treatment. By 96 h after UV-C treatment, chitinase, beta-1,3-glucanase, and PAL activities in UV-C-treated fruit were over twofold above the levels observed for the control. In nontreated control fruit, no apparent increase in chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase activities was detected but a minor increase in PAL activity was seen. The transient increase in chitinase, beta-1,3-glucanase, and PAL activities in UV-C-treated fruit was preceded by a gradual activation of the corresponding genes. UV-C-treated fruit showed an increase in accumulation of beta-1,3-glucanase and chitinase mRNAs at 3 h after treatment, which peaked approximately 96 h posttreatment. A similar induction kinetic pattern was observed for PAL mRNA in response to UV-C treatment, except the induction started 6 h after UV-C treatment. These results show that the response of peach fruit to elicitor treatment is similar to that seen in other plant-elicitors interactions and suggests the involvement of peach biochemical defense responses in UV-C-mediated disease resistance.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C induced chitinase, beta-1,3-glucanase and PAL activity from 6 h, peaking at 96 h.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
UV-C lighte0
Outcome
chitinase, beta-1,3-glucanase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activitiese0
Direction
inductione0
Qualifier
starting 6 h after treatment and reaching maximum levels at 96 h after treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of peach fruit with UV-C light caused a rapid induction of chitinase, beta-1,3-glucanase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activities starting 6 h after treatment and reaching maximum levels at 96 h after treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–239 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 96 h UV-C treated fruit had more than twice the control activities of three defense enzymes.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Treatment
UV-C treatmente0
Outcome
chitinase, beta-1,3-glucanase, and PAL activitiese0
Direction
abovee0
Value
over twofolde0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By 96 h after UV-C treatment, chitinase, beta-1,3-glucanase, and PAL activities in UV-C-treated fruit were over twofold above the levels observed for the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 240–402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In control fruit, chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase activity did not visibly increase.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase activitiese0
Direction
no apparent increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In nontreated control fruit, no apparent increase in chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase activities was detected but a minor increase in PAL activity was seen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control fruit showed a minor PAL activity increase.

Organ / stage
fruite0
Outcome
PAL activitye0
Direction
minor increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In nontreated control fruit, no apparent increase in chitinase and beta-1,3-glucanase activities was detected but a minor increase in PAL activity was seen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 403–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Defense enzyme activity increases were preceded by activation of corresponding genes.

Treatment
UV-Ce0
Gene
corresponding genese0
Outcome
transient increase in chitinase, beta-1,3-glucanase, and PAL activitiese0
Direction
increasee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The transient increase in chitinase, beta-1,3-glucanase, and PAL activities in UV-C-treated fruit was preceded by a gradual activation of the corresponding genes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UV-C increased beta-1,3-glucanase and chitinase mRNA from 3 h, peaking near 96 h.

Treatment
UV-Ce0
Outcome
accumulation of beta-1,3-glucanase and chitinase mRNAse0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
at 3 h after treatment, which peaked approximately 96 h posttreatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“UV-C-treated fruit showed an increase in accumulation of beta-1,3-glucanase and chitinase mRNAs at 3 h after treatment, which peaked approximately 96 h posttreatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 723–889 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PAL mRNA induction after UV-C began at 6 h.

Treatment
UV-C treatmente0
Outcome
PAL mRNAe0
Direction
inductione0
Qualifier
started 6 h after UV-C treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A similar induction kinetic pattern was observed for PAL mRNA in response to UV-C treatment, except the induction started 6 h after UV-C treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 890–1037 · show in text ↑
t0

“Peach Fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–87 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors suggested peach biochemical defense responses contribute to UV-C-mediated disease resistance.

Outcome
UV-C-mediated disease resistancee0
Qualifier
peach biochemical defense responsese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica
Prunus persica · TaxonAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggests the involvement of peach biochemical defense responses in UV-C-mediated disease resistance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1178–1278 · show in text ↑

light · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Prunus persica (peach)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

uv · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.