Paper · 1985 · Agronomy Journal

Methods of Placement for Increasing the Efficiency of N Fertilizers Applied in the Fall1

S. S. Malhi; M. Nyborg

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
50
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract In portions of the Prairie Provinces of Canada, fall‐applied fertilizer N is often less effective in increasing yields of cereal crops than fertilizer N applied in the spring. Field experiments were conducted in northern and central Alberta on Udic Boroll, Boralfic Boroll, and Boralf soils to find if there was a consistent increase in yield and N uptake of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) when fall‐applied urea was placed in bands and in nests as compared to the conventional mixing into the soil. There were 14 field experiments with the fallapplications during 3 years, and 13 of the experiments were cropped. The crop was spring‐sown barley. Fall‐applied urea gave higher grain yield, recovery of N in grain and recovery of N in grain + straw when placed in 46 cm spaced bands, and more so in nests, than when urea was incorporated into soil in the conventional manner. Nests were obtained by placing the N fertilizer at a point in each area of 46 ✕ 46 cm and at a depth of approximately 5 cm. The average increases in grain yield from urea incorporated in the fall, from urea banded in the fall, from nest placement of urea applied in the fall, and from urea incorporated in the spring at seeding time were 810, 1220, 1530, and 1680 kg ha −1 , respectively. In the same order, the recoveries of fertilizer N in grain plus straw were 26, 40, 53, and 61% although values were similar for banding and nest placement in 5 of the 13 experiments. Nitrification of fall‐applied N was slowed with banding and especially with nests, as compared to incorporation. With less nitrification, there was less over‐winter loss of fall‐applied N, apparently through reducing denitrification. As with urea, fall‐applied aqua NH 3 placed in nests produced greater grain yield, N uptake by grain and N uptake by the whole plant as compared to aqua NH 3 injected in bands. There were six other cropped experiments where there was only spring application of nesting, banding, and mixing. With spring application, nest placement of urea was inferior to banding or mixing of urea, unless the spacing of nests was reduced from 46 ✕ 46 cm to 23 ✕ 23 cm or the application of nests was made 2 weeks before sowing with subsequent cultivation. Nest placement is an alternative to chemical inhibitors of nitrification with fall‐applied N fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall urea in bands increased barley grain yield relative to conventional incorporation.

Treatment
46 cm spaced bandse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
incorporated into soil in the conventional mannere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fall‐applied urea gave higher grain yield, recovery of N in grain and recovery of N in grain + straw when placed in 46 cm spaced bands, and more so in nests, than when urea was incorporated into soil in the conventional manner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–880 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall urea in nests increased barley grain yield more than bands.

Treatment
nestse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
more soe0
Comparator
46 cm spaced bandse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fall‐applied urea gave higher grain yield, recovery of N in grain and recovery of N in grain + straw when placed in 46 cm spaced bands, and more so in nests”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–810 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall urea placement in bands increased recovery of nitrogen in barley grain and grain plus straw.

Treatment
46 cm spaced bandse0
Outcome
recovery of N in grain and recovery of N in grain + strawe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
incorporated into soil in the conventional mannere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fall‐applied urea gave higher grain yield, recovery of N in grain and recovery of N in grain + straw when placed in 46 cm spaced bands, and more so in nests, than when urea was incorporated into soil in the conventional manner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–880 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall incorporated urea raised barley grain yield by an average 810 kg ha −1.

Treatment
urea incorporated in the falle0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
810e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average increases in grain yield from urea incorporated in the fall, from urea banded in the fall, from nest placement of urea applied in the fall, and from urea incorporated in the spring at seeding time were 810, 1220, 1530, and 1680 kg ha −1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1269 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall banded urea raised barley grain yield by an average 1220 kg ha −1.

Treatment
urea banded in the falle0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
1220e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average increases in grain yield from urea incorporated in the fall, from urea banded in the fall, from nest placement of urea applied in the fall, and from urea incorporated in the spring at seeding time were 810, 1220, 1530, and 1680 kg ha −1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1269 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall nest placement of urea raised barley grain yield by an average 1530 kg ha −1.

Treatment
nest placement of urea applied in the falle0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
1530e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average increases in grain yield from urea incorporated in the fall, from urea banded in the fall, from nest placement of urea applied in the fall, and from urea incorporated in the spring at seeding time were 810, 1220, 1530, and 1680 kg ha −1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1269 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring incorporated urea raised barley grain yield by an average 1680 kg ha −1.

Treatment
urea incorporated in the spring at seeding timee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasese0
Value
1680 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average increases in grain yield from urea incorporated in the fall, from urea banded in the fall, from nest placement of urea applied in the fall, and from urea incorporated in the spring at seeding time were 810, 1220, 1530, and 1680 kg ha −1 , respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1006–1269 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen recovery in grain plus straw was 26% after fall incorporation.

Outcome
recoveries of fertilizer N in grain plus strawe0
Value
26e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the recoveries of fertilizer N in grain plus straw were 26, 40, 53, and 61%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1365 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen recovery in grain plus straw was 40% after fall banding.

Outcome
recoveries of fertilizer N in grain plus strawe0
Value
40e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the recoveries of fertilizer N in grain plus straw were 26, 40, 53, and 61%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1365 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen recovery in grain plus straw was 53% after fall nesting.

Outcome
recoveries of fertilizer N in grain plus strawe0
Value
53e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the recoveries of fertilizer N in grain plus straw were 26, 40, 53, and 61%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1365 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen recovery in grain plus straw was 61% after spring incorporation.

Outcome
recoveries of fertilizer N in grain plus strawe0
Value
61%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the recoveries of fertilizer N in grain plus straw were 26, 40, 53, and 61%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1365 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Banding and nests slowed nitrification of fall-applied nitrogen compared with incorporation.

Treatment
bandinge0
Outcome
Nitrification of fall‐applied Ne0
Direction
slowede0
Comparator
incorporatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrification of fall‐applied N was slowed with banding and especially with nests, as compared to incorporation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1454–1565 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall aqua NH 3 in nests increased barley grain yield relative to band injection.

Treatment
fall‐applied aqua NH 3 placed in nestse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
aqua NH 3 injected in bandse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fall‐applied aqua NH 3 placed in nests produced greater grain yield, N uptake by grain and N uptake by the whole plant as compared to aqua NH 3 injected in bands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1863 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fall aqua NH 3 in nests increased grain and whole-plant nitrogen uptake relative to band injection.

Treatment
fall‐applied aqua NH 3 placed in nestse0
Outcome
N uptake by grain and N uptake by the whole plante0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
aqua NH 3 injected in bandse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fall‐applied aqua NH 3 placed in nests produced greater grain yield, N uptake by grain and N uptake by the whole plant as compared to aqua NH 3 injected in bands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1702–1863 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring nest placement of urea was inferior to banding or mixing unless spacing or timing changed.

Treatment
nest placement of ureae0
Outcome
inferiore0
Direction
inferiore0
Comparator
banding or mixing of ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With spring application, nest placement of urea was inferior to banding or mixing of urea, unless the spacing of nests was reduced from 46 ✕ 46 cm to 23 ✕ 23 cm or the application of nests was made 2 weeks before sowing with subsequent cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1979–2226 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend nest placement as an alternative to chemical nitrification inhibitors for fall nitrogen fertilizer.

Outcome
Nest placement is an alternative to chemical inhibitors of nitrificatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nest placement is an alternative to chemical inhibitors of nitrification with fall‐applied N fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2228–2332 · show in text ↑
e1

“barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–396 · show in text ↑

water · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

water · nutrient: content · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

sowing time · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

70 papers: 39 positive, 31 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

66 papers more in this group

See all 70 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

299 papers: 252 positive, 47 negative or no effect

251 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

295 papers more in this group

See all 299 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.