Paper · 1967 · Indian Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding (The)

Induced Mutations in Bread Wheat

J. V. Goud

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
20
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To evaluate the efficiency of treatments with gamma rays, fast neutrons and ethylmethane sulphonate in producing mutations in qualitative characters in bread wheat an experiment was conducted with six varieties (N.P. 876, N.P. 872, N.P. 870, N.P. 868, N.P. 863 and N.P. 862). Treated and control seeds of all the six varieties were sown in the field. The growth and survival was much hampered in EMS treatments and 30 Kr gamma irradiation. N.P. 870 was much less affected by EMS treatment as compared to N.P. 876, while the latter was relatively more resistant to gamma irradiation. About 10 and 35 per cent. of chimeras (chlorophyll - ear) were observed in gamma and EMS treated plants respectively in M1, generation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EMS and 30 Kr gamma treatments hampered wheat growth and survival.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
EMS treatments and 30 Kr gamma irradiatione0
Outcome
growth and survivale0
Direction
much hamperede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“The growth and survival was much hampered in EMS treatments and 30 Kr gamma irradiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–439 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N.P. 870 was less affected by EMS than N.P. 876.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
N.P. 870e0
Treatment
EMS treatmente0
Outcome
affectede0
Direction
much lesse0
Comparator
N.P. 876e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“N.P. 870 was much less affected by EMS treatment as compared to N.P. 876”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–512 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N.P. 876 was relatively more resistant to gamma irradiation than N.P. 870.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
N.P. 876e0
Treatment
gamma irradiatione0
Outcome
resistante0
Direction
relatively moree0
Comparator
N.P. 870e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“N.P. 870 was much less affected by EMS treatment as compared to N.P. 876, while the latter was relatively more resistant to gamma irradiation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–582 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gamma treatment produced about 10 per cent chlorophyll-ear chimeras in M1.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
M1, generatione0
Treatment
gammae0
Outcome
chimeras (chlorophyll - ear)e0
Value
10e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“About 10 and 35 per cent. of chimeras (chlorophyll - ear) were observed in gamma and EMS treated plants respectively in M1, generation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–718 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EMS treatment produced about 35 per cent chlorophyll-ear chimeras in M1.

Taxon
Bread WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
M1, generatione0
Treatment
EMSe0
Outcome
chimeras (chlorophyll - ear)e0
Value
35 per cent.e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Bread Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–32 · show in text ↑
e0

“About 10 and 35 per cent. of chimeras (chlorophyll - ear) were observed in gamma and EMS treated plants respectively in M1, generation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 583–718 · show in text ↑

ethyl methanesulfonate · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

radiation · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

radiation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 35 positive, 54 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.