Claim · model-written summary
Up to 30 minutes of red irradiation gave no difference in inhibition kinetics (about 20 to 25%) between irradiation lengths.
- Taxon
- Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- irradiatione2
- Outcome
- kinetics of inhibitione2
- Direction
- no differencee2
- Value
- 20 to 25%e2
- Qualifier
- Up to 30 minutese2
- Comparator
- different lengths of irradiatione2
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“intact dark-grown wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv Maris Huntsman) seedlings”
e2“Up to 30 minutes after the start of the irradiation treatment, there was no difference in the kinetics of inhibition (about 20 to 25% inhibition) between the different lengths of irradiation”
Title
Rapid Suppression of Extension Growth in Dark-Grown Wheat Seedlings by Red Light
Wilfrid Bleiss; Harry Smith PLANT PHYSIOLOGY 1985. doi:10.1104/pp.77.3.552
Other claims from this paper (5)
- Intervention effect Red-light irradiation of the coleoptile tip decreased extension rate after a latent period of 8 to 10 minutes, relative to the dark control.
- Intervention effect Extension rate reached a minimum of 65% inhibition at about 85 minutes after red light.
- Intervention effect After about 85 minutes, growth accelerated toward the dark control rate after red light.
- Intervention effect Far-red light did not reverse the rapid effect of red light on growth, even when given 4 seconds after red light.
- Intervention effect Short (15 seconds) far-red light did not induce a growth response.