Paper · 1993 · Soil Science Society of America Journal

Fate of Nitrogen‐15 Enriched Ammonium Nitrate Applied to Corn

G. B. Reddy; K. R. Reddy

11
claims
18
verbatim quotes
132
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Nitrogen utilization by corn ( Zea mays L.) is influenced by the form of inorganic N present in the root zone. A field experiment was conducted on Enon sandy loam (fine, mixed, thermic Ultic Hapludalf) to determine N use efficiency and its partitioning in various plant parts of corn. Ammonium nitrate labeled either as 15 NH 4 ‐N or 15 NO 3 ‐N and applied at 50, 100, or 200 kg N ha −1 was evaluated. Microplots (1.06 m 2 ) were established in the main N plots for 15 N fertilizer application, and main plots were used to determine grain yield. After the crop harvest, soil N alone, fertilizer N used by the crop, and fertilizer N remaining in inorganic and organic forms in the top 75 cm of the soil were measured. Grain yield response to N application was significant ( P < 0.01). Recovery of applied fertilizer N in corn and weeds ranged from 43 to 57% and 3 to 5%, respectively. Nitrogen sources showed no significant differences with respect to N accumulation in corn. Only 17 to 20% of the fertilizer N was recovered in the grain. The amounts of soil N utilized by the corn was about three‐to sixfold higher than the fertilizer N, suggesting extensive turnover of soil and fertilizer N through immobilization and mineralization. More N was recovered (21–63% of added N) in the soil from 15 NH 4 than from 15 NO 3 (6–38%). Loss of N (unaccounted for) ranged from 11 to 18% at 100 kg N ha −1 and from 34 to 48% at 200 kg N ha −1 . Nitrogen loss was higher in the plots receiving 15 NO 3 than 15 NH 4 . Most of the fertilizer N remaining in the soil at the end of the growing season was in the organic fraction, suggesting immobilization into microbial and root biomass.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen application significantly increased grain yield.

Treatment
N applicatione0
Outcome
Grain yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield response to N application was significant ( P < 0.01)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn recovered 43 to 57% of applied fertilizer N.

Outcome
Recovery of applied fertilizer Ne0
Value
43 to 57%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Recovery of applied fertilizer N in corn and weeds ranged from 43 to 57% and 3 to 5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–891 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds recovered 3 to 5% of applied fertilizer N.

Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
Recovery of applied fertilizer N in corn and weedse0
Value
3 to 5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Recovery of applied fertilizer N in corn and weeds ranged from 43 to 57% and 3 to 5%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–891 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen sources did not differ significantly in corn N accumulation.

Treatment
Nitrogen sourcese0
Outcome
N accumulatione0
Direction
no significant differencese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen sources showed no significant differences with respect to N accumulation in corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–982 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain held 17 to 20% of fertilizer N.

Outcome
fertilizer N was recovered in the graine0
Value
17 to 20%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Only 17 to 20% of the fertilizer N was recovered in the grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1045 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn used about three to six times more soil N than fertilizer N.

Outcome
soil N utilizede0
Direction
highere0
Value
three‐to sixfolde0
Comparator
fertilizer Ne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amounts of soil N utilized by the corn was about three‐to sixfold higher than the fertilizer N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1145 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More added N remained in soil from labeled ammonium than labeled nitrate.

Outcome
N was recoverede0
Direction
Moree0
Value
21–63% of added Ne0
Qualifier
6–38%e0
Comparator
15 NO 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More N was recovered (21–63% of added N) in the soil from 15 NH 4 than from 15 NO 3 (6–38%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1245–1336 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unaccounted N was 11 to 18% at 100 kg N ha−1.

Treatment
100 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
Loss of Ne0
Value
11 to 18%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Loss of N (unaccounted for) ranged from 11 to 18% at 100 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1338–1405 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unaccounted N was 34 to 48% at 200 kg N ha−1.

Treatment
200 kg N ha −1e0
Outcome
34 to 48%e0
Value
34 to 48%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“from 34 to 48% at 200 kg N ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1442 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N loss was higher from labeled nitrate than labeled ammonium.

Treatment
15 NO 3e0
Outcome
Nitrogen losse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
15 NH 4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen loss was higher in the plots receiving 15 NO 3 than 15 NH 4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1513 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most residual fertilizer N was in the organic soil fraction.

Outcome
fertilizer N remaining in the soile0
Qualifier
organic fractione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the fertilizer N remaining in the soil at the end of the growing season was in the organic fraction”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1516–1623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–61 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

489 papers: 403 positive, 86 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 403 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

485 papers more in this group

See all 489 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.