Paper · 2007 · Annals of Applied Biology

Growth promotion and biological control of root‐knot nematodes in micropropagated banana during the nursery stage by treatment with specific bacterial strains

A.S. Rodríguez‐Romero; E. Badosa; E. Montesinos; et al.

5
claims
13
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The effect of strains EPS291 and EPS817 of Pseudomonas fluorescens to improve plant growth and nutrition as well as to reduce root‐knot nematode in roots was investigated in micropropagated banana. Plantlets, cultured under commercial nursery conditions, were treated twice with bacteria after transplanting from in vitro conditions. Bacterial application was performed by drenching bacterial suspension containing approximately 10 8 CFU (colony‐forming units) g −1 of substrate. Both strains significantly increased aerial fresh weight, plant length and leaf area, while the effect on other growth parameters depended on the strain. N content was also significantly increased after both bacteria treatments. A second experiment was performed to determine the potential biocontrol effect against the root‐knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica . Following the same experimental conditions, Meloidogyne inoculum containing 10 500 nematodes was applied 15 days after the second bacteria treatment. At the end of the experiment, 135 days later, nematode reproduction in roots of bacterised bananas was significantly reduced. In both experiments, the inoculated bacteria colonised the root system and population levels in root, 5.5 months after transplanting were 6.8 × 10 3 to 1.6 × 10 4 CFU g −1 fresh weight of root. The potential use of this technology to improve hardening stages in banana plant production in commercial nurseries is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both bacterial strains significantly increased aerial fresh weight, plant length, and leaf area of banana.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
strains EPS291 and EPS817 of Pseudomonas fluorescense1
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
aerial fresh weight, plant length and leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both strains significantly increased aerial fresh weight, plant length and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–573 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“strains EPS291 and EPS817 of Pseudomonas fluorescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other growth responses depended on bacterial strain.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
straine0
Outcome
other growth parameterse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“the effect on other growth parameters depended on the strain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 581–642 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Both bacterial treatments significantly increased banana nitrogen content.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
bacteria treatmentse0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
N contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N content was also significantly increased after both bacteria treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 643–717 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“strains EPS291 and EPS817 of Pseudomonas fluorescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–75 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bacterial treatment significantly reduced Meloidogyne javanica reproduction in banana roots.

Taxon
bananase0
Treatment
bacterisede0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae1pest
Outcome
nematode reproduction in rootse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“nematode reproduction in roots of bacterised bananas was significantly reduced.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1047–1126 · show in text ↑
e1

“root‐knot nematode Meloidogyne javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 809–848 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated bacteria colonized banana roots and reached 6.8 × 10 3 to 1.6 × 10 4 CFU g −1 fresh root weight.

Taxon
bananat0
Interactor
Pseudomonas fluorescensPseudomonas fluorescense1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
population levels in roote0
Value
6.8 × 10 3 to 1.6 × 10 4 CFU g −1 fresh weight of roote0
Qualifier
5.5 months after transplantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pseudomonas fluorescens
Pseudomonas fluorescens · InteractorNinjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the inoculated bacteria colonised the root system and population levels in root, 5.5 months after transplanting were 6.8 × 10 3 to 1.6 × 10 4 CFU g −1 fresh weight of root.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1148–1320 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–88 · show in text ↑
e1

“strains EPS291 and EPS817 of Pseudomonas fluorescens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 23–75 · show in text ↑

Pseudomonas fluorescens · growth · MusaResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

inoculation · Pseudomonas fluorescens · MusaResults agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.