Paper · 1985 · Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica

Growth Rate of Grains and Grain Yield of Wheat in Relation to Drought

V. Overgaard Mogensen

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A spring sown wheat (cv. “Sappo”) was grown on a loamy sand in lysimeters and affected by drought during the flowering and grain filling stage, respectively. Drought during the flowering stage reduced the grain yield by reducing the number of ears per unit of ground area, and the numbers of grains per ear. During the grain filling stage the grains continued to grow at the same rate in spite of increasing water stress until the soil water content reached the permanent wilting capacity. Then the growth stopped. Irrigation four weeks after terminated flowering, just before the permanent wilting capacity had been reached, had no effect on the further growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at flowering reduced wheat grain yield.

Treatment
Drought during the flowering stagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought during the flowering stage reduced the grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–225 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at flowering reduced wheat ears per ground area.

Treatment
Drought during the flowering stagee0
Outcome
number of ears per unit of ground areae0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought during the flowering stage reduced the grain yield by reducing the number of ears per unit of ground area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought at flowering reduced grains per ear in wheat.

Treatment
Drought during the flowering stagee0
Outcome
numbers of grains per eare0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drought during the flowering stage reduced the grain yield by reducing the number of ears per unit of ground area, and the numbers of grains per ear”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During grain filling, wheat grains grew at the same rate under increasing water stress until permanent wilting capacity.

Outcome
grains continued to grow at the same ratee0
Direction
same ratee0
Qualifier
until the soil water content reached the permanent wilting capacitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the grains continued to grow at the same rate in spite of increasing water stress until the soil water content reached the permanent wilting capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain growth stopped at permanent wilting capacity.

Outcome
growth stoppede0
Qualifier
permanent wilting capacitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Then the growth stopped”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 499–522 · show in text ↑
e1

“until the soil water content reached the permanent wilting capacity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–497 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation four weeks after flowering ended had no effect on further wheat grain growth.

Treatment
Irrigation four weeks after terminated floweringe0
Outcome
further growthe0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation four weeks after terminated flowering, just before the permanent wilting capacity had been reached, had no effect on the further growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 524–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–46 · show in text ↑

stage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 24 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

irrigation · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

242 papers: 177 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 177 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

238 papers more in this group

See all 242 papers →

drought · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

632 papers: 95 positive, 537 negative or no effect

536 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

628 papers more in this group

See all 632 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.