Abstract
A field study was taken up for two years to know the effect of early application of ethrel on growth, yield and quality of cotton during kharif 2008 and 2009 invertisols revealed that the application of ethrel @ 30ppm at 35–45 days after sowing (atthetime of square initiation) gave maximum seed cotton yield in all the test entries studied. The physiological manipulation of morphoframes through different means not only changed the morphology of the cotton plant, but also the growth pattern, accumulation of dry matter production, harvest index and ultimately the seed cotton yield of the plant. It is very much interesting to note that there was no significant influence on quality characteristics of cotton fibre through this application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Ethrel applied at 30 ppm at 35-45 days after sowing gave maximum seed cotton yield in all test entries.
- Taxon
- cotton
Gossypium hirsutume1 - Treatment
- application of ethrel @ 30ppm at 35–45 days after sowinge1
- Outcome
- seed cotton yielde1
- Direction
- maximume1
- Setting
- vertisols of Andhra Pradesh, Indiat0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field study was taken up for two years to know the effect of early application of ethrel on growth, yield and quality of cotton during kharif 2008 and 2009 invertisols revealed that the application of ethrel @ 30ppm at 35–45 days after sowing (atthetime of square initiation) gave maximum seed cotton yield in all the test entries studied”
t0“vertisols of Andhra Pradesh, India”
Claim · model-written summary
Early ethrel application had no significant influence on cotton fibre quality characteristics.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume1
- Treatment
- application of ethrele1
- Outcome
- quality characteristics of cotton fibree2
- Direction
- no significant influencee2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“A field study was taken up for two years to know the effect of early application of ethrel on growth, yield and quality of cotton during kharif 2008 and 2009 invertisols revealed that the application of ethrel @ 30ppm at 35–45 days after sowing (atthetime of square initiation) gave maximum seed cotton yield in all the test entries studied”
e2“It is very much interesting to note that there was no significant influence on quality characteristics of cotton fibre through this application”
Claim · model-written summary
Physiological manipulation with ethrel changed the morphology of the cotton plant.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume3
- Treatment
- physiological manipulation of morphoframes through different meanse3
- Outcome
- morphology of the cotton plante3
- Direction
- changede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“The physiological manipulation of morphoframes through different means not only changed the morphology of the cotton plant, but also the growth pattern, accumulation of dry matter production, harvest index and ultimately the seed cotton yield of the plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Physiological manipulation with ethrel changed the growth pattern of cotton.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume3
- Treatment
- physiological manipulation of morphoframes through different meanse3
- Outcome
- growth patterne3
- Direction
- changede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“The physiological manipulation of morphoframes through different means not only changed the morphology of the cotton plant, but also the growth pattern, accumulation of dry matter production, harvest index and ultimately the seed cotton yield of the plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Physiological manipulation with ethrel changed accumulation of dry matter production in cotton.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume3
- Treatment
- physiological manipulation of morphoframes through different meanse3
- Outcome
- accumulation of dry matter productione3
- Direction
- changede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“The physiological manipulation of morphoframes through different means not only changed the morphology of the cotton plant, but also the growth pattern, accumulation of dry matter production, harvest index and ultimately the seed cotton yield of the plant”
Claim · model-written summary
Physiological manipulation with ethrel changed harvest index of cotton.
- Taxon
- cottonGossypium hirsutume3
- Treatment
- physiological manipulation of morphoframes through different meanse3
- Outcome
- harvest indexe3
- Direction
- changede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e3“The physiological manipulation of morphoframes through different means not only changed the morphology of the cotton plant, but also the growth pattern, accumulation of dry matter production, harvest index and ultimately the seed cotton yield of the plant”
The same questions in other papers
(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: grain · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Results differ
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.