Paper · 1983 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Effect of Mg And Zn fertilization on soil test levels, ear leaf composition, and yields of corn in northern West Virginia

W.L. Stout; O.L. Bennett

2
claims
5
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract A corn fertility study was conducted at two locations in northern West Virginia to determine the response of corn (Zea mays L.) to applied Mg and Zn on two soils testing low in Mg by the ammonium acetate and Baker tests and low in Zn by the Baker test. The study consisted of three rates of Mg (0, 112, and 224 kg/ha) and three rates of Zn (0, 3.36, and 6.72 kg/ha) applied in a factorial design. The soil at the Morgantown location was medium textured with a CEC of 22.4, and the soil at the Reedsville location was coarse textured with a CEC of 15.8. Yield responses to applied Mg were obtained only on the coarse textured soil at the Reedsville location where exchangeable Mg was less than 5% of the CEC and equilibrium Mg was less than 9.0 10 ‐4M. No yield response to Zn was obtained at either location.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mg fertilization increased corn yield only on the coarse-textured soil at Reedsville

Treatment
applied Mge1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
increaseinferrede1
Qualifier
where exchangeable Mg was less than 5% of the CECe1
Setting
Reedsville locatione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of corn (Zea mays L.) to applied Mg and Zn on two soils testing low in Mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–188 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield responses to applied Mg were obtained only on the coarse textured soil at the Reedsville location where exchangeable Mg was less than 5% of the CEC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 562–715 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn fertilization had no effect on corn yield at either location

Treatment
Zne2
Outcome
yield responsee2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Setting
two locations in northern West Virginiae3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“response of corn (Zea mays L.) to applied Mg and Zn on two soils testing low in Mg”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 106–188 · show in text ↑
e2

“No yield response to Zn was obtained at either location”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–816 · show in text ↑
e3

“A corn fertility study was conducted at two locations in northern West Virginia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–88 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

47 papers: 36 positive, 11 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 391 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.