Paper · 2002 · Journal of Vegetable Crop Production

Season, and Nitrogen Source and Rate Affect Development and Yield of Shallot

Kebede Woldetsadik; Ulla Gertsson; Johan Ascard

12
claims
19
verbatim quotes
6
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Three field experiments were conducted in 1999 and 2000 to assess the response of shallots (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer) to nitrogen fertilizer sources and rates in eastern Ethiopia. Treatments comprised three nitrogen sources, urea, ammonium nitrate and ammonium sulphate, each at 0, 50, 100, 150 and 200 kg ha−1 N. Bulb yield was significantly increased with nitrogen fertilization up to 150 kg ha−1 in the main rainy season of 2000 when supplemental irrigation was applied. However, fertilization significantly reduced growth and yield of shallot in the main rainy season of 1999 and the short rainy season of 2000 under rain-fed conditions. Fertilization tended to increase bulb number per plant while reducing mean bulb weight. The dry matter and total soluble solids of bulbs from fertilized plots were either higher than or similar to those of unfertilized shallots. Ammonium nitrate produced significantly higher yields of shallots than ammonium sulphate, but did not differ from urea. Nitrogen source did not have significant effects on plant height, leaf number, bulb weight or bulb diameter. Higher nitrogen levels increased leaf and bulb nitrogen contents at harvest. The results indicated that nitrogen fertilizer should not be used for rain-fed shallots under low moisture regimes. Supplemental irrigation is essential in order to achieve high yields with nitrogen fertilization practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bulb yield of shallot was significantly increased by nitrogen fertilization up to 150 kg ha−1 in the main rainy season of 2000 when supplemental irrigation was applied.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilization up to 150 kg ha−1e1
Outcome
Bulb yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
when supplemental irrigation was appliede1
Setting
eastern Ethiopiae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shallots (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer) to nitrogen fertilizer sources and rates in eastern Ethiopia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–198 · show in text ↑
e1

“Bulb yield was significantly increased with nitrogen fertilization up to 150 kg ha−1 in the main rainy season of 2000 when supplemental irrigation was applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 334–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization significantly reduced growth and yield of shallot in the main rainy season of 1999 and the short rainy season of 2000 under rain-fed conditions.

Treatment
fertilizatione0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
under rain-fed conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fertilization significantly reduced growth and yield of shallot in the main rainy season of 1999 and the short rainy season of 2000 under rain-fed conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 503–660 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization tended to increase bulb number per plant in shallot.

Treatment
Fertilizatione1
Outcome
bulb number per plante1
Direction
increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shallots (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilization tended to increase bulb number per plant while reducing mean bulb weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilization reduced mean bulb weight in shallot.

Treatment
Fertilizatione1
Outcome
mean bulb weighte1
Direction
reducinge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shallots (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“Fertilization tended to increase bulb number per plant while reducing mean bulb weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–748 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry matter and total soluble solids of bulbs from fertilized plots were either higher than or similar to those of unfertilized shallots.

Treatment
fertilized plotse0
Outcome
dry matter and total soluble solids of bulbse0
Direction
higher than or similar toe0
Comparator
unfertilized shallotse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The dry matter and total soluble solids of bulbs from fertilized plots were either higher than or similar to those of unfertilized shallots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–889 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate produced significantly higher shallot yields than ammonium sulphate.

Treatment
Ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
yields of shallotse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
ammonium sulphatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium nitrate produced significantly higher yields of shallots than ammonium sulphate, but did not differ from urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shallot yields with ammonium nitrate did not differ from those with urea.

Treatment
Ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
yields of shallotse0
Direction
did not differe0
Comparator
ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ammonium nitrate produced significantly higher yields of shallots than ammonium sulphate, but did not differ from urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–1009 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen source did not have significant effects on shallot plant height or leaf number.

Treatment
Nitrogen sourcee1
Outcome
plant height, leaf numbere1
Direction
did not have significant effectse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shallots (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen source did not have significant effects on plant height, leaf number, bulb weight or bulb diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen source did not have significant effects on shallot bulb weight or bulb diameter.

Treatment
Nitrogen sourcee1
Outcome
bulb weight or bulb diametere1
Direction
did not have significant effectse1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shallots (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“Nitrogen source did not have significant effects on plant height, leaf number, bulb weight or bulb diameter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1118 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher nitrogen levels increased leaf and bulb nitrogen contents of shallot at harvest.

Treatment
Higher nitrogen levelse1
Outcome
leaf and bulb nitrogen contentse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shallots (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“Higher nitrogen levels increased leaf and bulb nitrogen contents at harvest”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1120–1195 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer should not be used for rain-fed shallots under low moisture regimes.

Outcome
nitrogen fertilizer should not be usede0
Qualifier
under low moisture regimese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen fertilizer should not be used for rain-fed shallots under low moisture regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1311 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Supplemental irrigation is essential to achieve high shallot yields with nitrogen fertilization.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilization practicese1
Outcome
Supplemental irrigation is essentiale1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“shallots (Allium cepa var. ascalonicum Backer)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 91–137 · show in text ↑
e1

“Supplemental irrigation is essential in order to achieve high yields with nitrogen fertilization practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1313–1419 · show in text ↑

ammonium nitrate · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Allium cepa (onion)Results differ

81 papers: 71 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

184 papers: 157 positive, 27 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 157 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

180 papers more in this group

See all 184 papers →

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

463 papers in the same direction as this paper · 59 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

526 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.