Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization had no significant effect on bulb yield.

A claim from Shallot yield, quality and storability as affected by irrigation and nitrogen · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization had no significant effect on bulb yield.

Treatment
nitrogen fertilizatione0
Outcome
yielde0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium cepa var. aggregatum
Allium cepa var. aggregatum · TaxonEvan-Amos · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No significant effects were observed on the yield, dry matter, soluble solids and storability of bulbs due to the nitrogen fertilization.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1275
t0

“Shallot yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–13

Title

Shallot yield, quality and storability as affected by irrigation and nitrogen

K. Woldetsadik; U. Gertsson; J. Ascard The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 2003. doi:10.1080/14620316.2003.11511661

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-1210c19062b11fb84548ef92081ef447047abc298161743ac0af7eda30d03edc · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Allium cepa (onion)Positive and negative results

530 papers: 464 positive, 66 negative or no effect

65 papers in the same direction as this claim · 464 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

521 papers more in this group

See all 530 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.