Paper · 1990 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Dryland corn response to tillage and nitrogen fertilization. I. Growth‐yield‐N relationships

G. K. Evanylo

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Crop response to fertilizer nitrogen (N) is dependent upon tillage management. This study was conducted to determine how tillage rotation influences non‐irrigated crop growth, N uptake and yield. The effects of tillage rotation, N rate and N timing schedule on early season dry matter production and N uptake, ear leaf N concentration at silking, and yield of corn [Zea mays (L.) Pioneer 3378] were investigated at Painter, VA, on an Altavista loam (fine‐loamy, mixed, thermic Aquic Hapludult). In 1986, maximum yields achieved in the 6‐year continuous no till (NT) [5.82 Mg/ha] and first year no till (AT) [5.64 Mg/ha] were significantly greater than that of the 6‐year continuous conventional till (CT) [3.67 Mg/ha], but no yield differences were obtained in the drier 1987 season. A higher rate of N fertilizer was required to obtain maximum yield in the first year no till (168 kg N/ha) than in the NT (112 kg N/ha) during 1986. Early 1986 N uptake and growth response with and without N at planting increased in the order CT < AT = NT and AT < CT < NT, respectively, indicating greatest immobilization of soil N occurred in the newly established no till soil. Lack of differences in critical ear leaf N values developed for NT and CT in each year imply that plant norms developed for one tillage system may accurately assess N status of corn grown under different tillage practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1986, continuous no till yielded significantly more than continuous conventional till.

Treatment
6‐year continuous no till (NT)e0
Outcome
maximum yieldse0
Direction
significantly greatere0
Value
5.82 Mg/hae0
Qualifier
3.67 Mg/hae0
Comparator
6‐year continuous conventional till (CT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1986, maximum yields achieved in the 6‐year continuous no till (NT) [5.82 Mg/ha] and first year no till (AT) [5.64 Mg/ha] were significantly greater than that of the 6‐year continuous conventional till (CT) [3.67 Mg/ha]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1986, first year no till yielded significantly more than continuous conventional till.

Treatment
first year no till (AT)e0
Outcome
maximum yieldse0
Direction
significantly greatere0
Value
5.64 Mg/hae0
Qualifier
3.67 Mg/hae0
Comparator
6‐year continuous conventional till (CT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1986, maximum yields achieved in the 6‐year continuous no till (NT) [5.82 Mg/ha] and first year no till (AT) [5.64 Mg/ha] were significantly greater than that of the 6‐year continuous conventional till (CT) [3.67 Mg/ha]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–726 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–12 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The drier 1987 season showed no yield differences between tillage treatments.

Outcome
yield differencese0
Direction
no yield differencese0
Qualifier
drier 1987 seasone0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but no yield differences were obtained in the drier 1987 season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–791 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–12 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First year no till required a higher fertilizer N rate for maximum yield than continuous no till in 1986.

Treatment
first year no tille0
Outcome
rate of N fertilizer was required to obtain maximum yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
168 kg N/hae0
Qualifier
112 kg N/hae0
Comparator
NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher rate of N fertilizer was required to obtain maximum yield in the first year no till (168 kg N/ha) than in the NT (112 kg N/ha) during 1986”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 793–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–12 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early 1986 nitrogen uptake ranked CT below AT and NT.

Outcome
N uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
CT < AT = NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early 1986 N uptake and growth response with and without N at planting increased in the order CT < AT = NT and AT < CT < NT, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–12 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early 1986 growth response ranked AT below CT below NT.

Outcome
growth responsee0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
AT < CT < NTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Early 1986 N uptake and growth response with and without N at planting increased in the order CT < AT = NT and AT < CT < NT, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1079 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–12 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Critical ear leaf N values did not differ between NT and CT within either year.

Outcome
critical ear leaf N valuese0
Direction
Lack of differencese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lack of differences in critical ear leaf N values developed for NT and CT in each year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1174–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–12 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors infer that a plant N norm from one tillage system may assess corn N status in another.

Outcome
plant norms developed for one tillage system may accurately assess N statuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant norms developed for one tillage system may accurately assess N status of corn grown under different tillage practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1395 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.