Intervention effectmodel-written summary

In 1986, continuous no till yielded significantly more than continuous conventional till.

A claim from Dryland corn response to tillage and nitrogen fertilization. I. Growth‐yield‐N relationships · 1990

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1986, continuous no till yielded significantly more than continuous conventional till.

Treatment
6‐year continuous no till (NT)e0
Outcome
maximum yieldse0
Direction
significantly greatere0
Value
5.82 Mg/hae0
Qualifier
3.67 Mg/hae0
Comparator
6‐year continuous conventional till (CT)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1986, maximum yields achieved in the 6‐year continuous no till (NT) [5.82 Mg/ha] and first year no till (AT) [5.64 Mg/ha] were significantly greater than that of the 6‐year continuous conventional till (CT) [3.67 Mg/ha]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–726
t0

“corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–12

Title

Dryland corn response to tillage and nitrogen fertilization. I. Growth‐yield‐N relationships

G. K. Evanylo Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 1990. doi:10.1080/00103629009368220

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-8141dbdb65de2013cf9dc9df38a4684013d0f8ed453a27b9eadacc6127770bf3 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.