Abstract
L ynch J.M. & C lark S arah J. 1984. Ejects of microbial colonization of barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) roots on seedling growth. Journal of Applied Bacteriology 56 , 47–52. A range of micro‐organisms, particularly pseudomonads, was isolated from seed, rhizosphere soil and straw. Their colonization and effects on the growth of barley seedlings in gnotobiotic culture were studied. The colonization potentials of the different species were between 004 and 47 times 10 6 viable cells/mg dry root. Some organisms stimulated root and shoot extension and dry matter production while others were inhibitory; these effects were not directly related to the colonization potentials.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Some micro-organisms stimulated barley root and shoot extension and dry matter production
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree1 - Treatment
- microbial colonizationt0
- Outcome
- root and shoot extension and dry matter productione2
- Direction
- stimulatede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“Their colonization and effects on the growth of barley seedlings in gnotobiotic culture were studied”
e2“Some organisms stimulated root and shoot extension and dry matter production while others were inhibitory”
t0“microbial colonization of barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Some micro-organisms inhibited barley seedling growth
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree1
- Treatment
- microbial colonizationt0
- Outcome
- growth of barley seedlingse1
- Direction
- inhibitorye2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Their colonization and effects on the growth of barley seedlings in gnotobiotic culture were studied”
e2“Some organisms stimulated root and shoot extension and dry matter production while others were inhibitory”
t0“microbial colonization of barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Effects of colonizing micro-organisms on barley growth were not directly related to their colonization potentials
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree1
- Treatment
- colonizatione1
- Outcome
- these effectse3
- Direction
- not directly relatede3
- Comparator
- colonization potentialse3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Their colonization and effects on the growth of barley seedlings in gnotobiotic culture were studied”
e3“these effects were not directly related to the colonization potentials”
Claim · model-written summary
Colonization potentials of the micro-organisms on barley roots were between 0.04 and 4.7 x 10^6 viable cells per mg dry root
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree1
- Outcome
- colonization potentialse4
- Value
- between 004 and 47 times 10 6 viable cells/mg dry roote4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Their colonization and effects on the growth of barley seedlings in gnotobiotic culture were studied”
e4“The colonization potentials of the different species were between 004 and 47 times 10 6 viable cells/mg dry root”
Claim · model-written summary
A range of micro-organisms, particularly pseudomonads, was isolated from barley seed, rhizosphere soil and straw
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree1
- Interactor
- pseudomonadse0other
- Outcome
- was isolatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A range of micro‐organisms, particularly pseudomonads, was isolated from seed, rhizosphere soil and straw”
e1“Their colonization and effects on the growth of barley seedlings in gnotobiotic culture were studied”
The same questions in other papers
infection · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- negative
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →infection · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.