Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science

Increasing root and leaf growth and yield in Mg‐deficient faba beans (Vicia faba) by MgSO4 foliar fertilization

Christina Neuhaus; Christoph‐Martin Geilfus; Karl‐Hermann Mühling

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
50
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Magnesium (Mg) deficiency reduces yield and quality of crops as Mg is involved in carbohydrate and protein anabolism. Foliar application of MgSO 4 represents a means of ameliorating the nutritional status of crops growing under conditions of deficiency. Foliar Mg application has been demonstrated to increase the chlorophyll concentration and vegetative yield of plants. However, in crop plants used for seed production, the limited number of available studies provides only conflicting results in terms of the efficiency of Mg leaf application on yield and quality. We have examined the effect of increasing Mg foliar application rates on differentially developed leaves and leaf stages with regards to Mg concentration, chlorophyll concentration and biomass formation. Our data reveal that in order to obtain significant effects MgSO 4 concentrations in the spraying solution should be higher than 50 mM, as lower concentrations did not lead to significant changes in the vegetative or generative material. Positive effects of the foliar application on chlorophyll concentration and leaf area were only measured in leaves treated with 200 mM foliar MgSO 4 . The application of Mg did not affect the parameters chlorophyll, ion concentration and leaf area in the newly developing leaves, but it had an important influence with regard to yield traits, especially on the formation of pods. The quality of the seeds with regard to the protein concentration was reduced in response to the magnesium deficiency treatment, but the application of foliar magnesium prevented a significant loss of protein.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)basis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

MgSO4 spray concentrations above 50 mM were needed for significant effects on faba bean material.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabat0
Outcome
MgSO 4 concentrations in the spraying solution should be higher than 50 mMe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in order to obtain significant effects MgSO 4 concentrations in the spraying solution should be higher than 50 mM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–915 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprays below 50 mM did not significantly change vegetative or generative material.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabat0
Treatment
lower concentrationse0
Outcome
vegetative or generative materiale0
Direction
did not lead to significant changese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower concentrations did not lead to significant changes in the vegetative or generative material”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1017 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 200 mM MgSO4 spray increased chlorophyll concentration in treated leaves.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
200 mM foliar MgSO 4e0
Outcome
chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
Positive effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Positive effects of the foliar application on chlorophyll concentration and leaf area were only measured in leaves treated with 200 mM foliar MgSO 4 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 200 mM MgSO4 spray increased leaf area in treated leaves.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabat0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
200 mM foliar MgSO 4e0
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
Positive effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Positive effects of the foliar application on chlorophyll concentration and leaf area were only measured in leaves treated with 200 mM foliar MgSO 4 .”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar magnesium did not affect chlorophyll, ion concentration or leaf area in newly developing leaves.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabat0
Organ / stage
newly developing leavese0
Treatment
application of Mge0
Outcome
chlorophyll, ion concentration and leaf areae0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of Mg did not affect the parameters chlorophyll, ion concentration and leaf area in the newly developing leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1297 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar magnesium influenced faba bean pod formation.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabat0
Treatment
application of Mge1
Outcome
formation of podse0
Direction
important influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it had an important influence with regard to yield traits, especially on the formation of pods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1303–1398 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of Mg did not affect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1170–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Magnesium deficiency reduced seed protein concentration.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabat0
Organ / stage
seedse0
Treatment
magnesium deficiency treatmente0
Outcome
protein concentratione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The quality of the seeds with regard to the protein concentration was reduced in response to the magnesium deficiency treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar magnesium prevented significant seed protein loss under deficiency.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabat0
Treatment
application of foliar magnesiume0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
preventede0
Comparator
magnesium deficiency treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of foliar magnesium prevented a significant loss of protein.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1532–1608 · show in text ↑
e1

“The quality of the seeds with regard to the protein concentration was reduced in response to the magnesium deficiency treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1399–1526 · show in text ↑
t0

“faba beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑

magnesium atom · physiology: pigments · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

application · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

application · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 58 positive, 8 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

23 papers: 23 positive, 0 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.