Paper · 2022 · Plants

Foliar Application of Different Iron Sources Improves Morpho-Physiological Traits and Nutritional Quality of Broad Bean Grown in Sandy Soil

Abdel Wahab M. Mahmoud; Amira A. Ayad; Hend S. M. Abdel-Aziz; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
65
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Nano-fertilizers are a new tool that can be used to address plant production challenges, and it addresses such nutrient deficiencies through smart agriculture approaches. Iron (Fe) is a vital element for several metabolic and physiological processes; however, Fe deficiency is common in poorly fertile soils (sand soil) and in arid areas. Therefore, additional research is required to select the most efficient form of iron absorbance. This research was implemented on broad bean plants (Vicia faba L. var. major Harz) to examine the impact of three iron sources: nano-iron (FeNPs, T1), iron sulfate (T2), and chelated iron (T3) as a foliar spray on the morphological properties, physiological attributes, and nutritional status of these plants compared to the untreated plants (control). The obtained results showed that foliar spraying with FeNPs, chelated iron and sulphate iron fertilizers increased plant height by 35.01%, 26.2, and 20.4%; leaf area by 38.8%, 18.3%, and 8.1%; the fresh weight of the plant by 47%, 32.8%, and 7.3%; the dry weight of the plant by 52.9%, 37.3%, and 11.2%; and the number of branches by 47%, 31.3%, and 25.6 %, respectively, compared to the control treatment (CT). Furthermore, the application of FeNPs, chelated iron, and sulphate iron fertilizers improved the number of pods by 47.9%, 24.8%, and 6.1%; the number of seeds by 32.8%, 7.9%, and 2.8%; and seed weight by 20.8%, 9.1%, and 5.4%, compared to control treatment (CT). Additionally, foliar application of FeNPs showed the highest values of photosynthesis rate (Pn), water-use efficiency (WUE), total chlorophyll, and phytohormones (IAA, GA3) compared to all the other treatments. The anatomical structure revealed an enhancement of leaf size and thickness (epidermis cells and mesophyll tissue) affected by FeNPs treatment compared to other treatments. Foliar application of FeNPs also improved the total content of carbohydrates, crude protein, element content (N, P, K, Ca, Na, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu), and some amino acids such as lysine, arginine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, and tyrosine in the seeds of broad beans. Based on the above results, the maximum values of all tested measurements were observed when FeNPs were used as the foliar spraying followed by chelated and sulphate iron fertilizers. Therefore, these findings suggest that using FeNPs, as a foliar treatment, could be a promising strategy for reducing the Fe deficiency in sandy soil and enhancing plant growth, pod yield, and pod quality of broad bean plants in addition to being environmentally favored in arid areas.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar iron sources increased broad bean plant height, leaf area and plant weights.

Taxon
Broad BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
foliar spraying with FeNPs, chelated iron and sulphate iron fertilizerse0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatment (CT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar spraying with FeNPs, chelated iron and sulphate iron fertilizers increased plant height by 35.01%, 26.2, and 20.4%; leaf area by 38.8%, 18.3%, and 8.1%; the fresh weight of the plant by 47%, 32.8%, and 7.3%; the dry weight of the plant by 52.9%, 37.3%, and 11.2%; and the number of branches by 47%, 31.3%, and 25.6 %, respectively, compared to the control treatment (CT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 822–1199 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broad Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“Broad Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar iron sources improved pod and seed production.

Taxon
Broad BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
application of FeNPs, chelated iron, and sulphate iron fertilizerse0
Outcome
number of podse0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
control treatment (CT)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of FeNPs, chelated iron, and sulphate iron fertilizers improved the number of pods by 47.9%, 24.8%, and 6.1%; the number of seeds by 32.8%, 7.9%, and 2.8%; and seed weight by 20.8%, 9.1%, and 5.4%, compared to control treatment (CT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1214–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broad Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“Broad Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeNPs yielded the highest photosynthesis, water use efficiency, chlorophyll and phytohormones.

Taxon
Broad BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
foliar application of FeNPse0
Outcome
photosynthesis rate (Pn), water-use efficiency (WUE), total chlorophyll, and phytohormones (IAA, GA3)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
all the other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of FeNPs showed the highest values of photosynthesis rate (Pn), water-use efficiency (WUE), total chlorophyll, and phytohormones (IAA, GA3) compared to all the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1478–1673 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broad Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“Broad Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeNPs enhanced leaf size and thickness.

Taxon
Broad BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
FeNPs treatmente0
Outcome
leaf size and thicknesse0
Direction
enhancemente0
Comparator
other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an enhancement of leaf size and thickness (epidermis cells and mesophyll tissue) affected by FeNPs treatment compared to other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1709–1846 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broad Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“Broad Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeNPs improved seed carbohydrate, protein, element and amino acid content.

Taxon
broad beansVicia fabae0
Treatment
Foliar application of FeNPse0
Outcome
total content of carbohydrates, crude protein, element content (N, P, K, Ca, Na, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu), and some amino acids such as lysine, arginine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, and tyrosinee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar application of FeNPs also improved the total content of carbohydrates, crude protein, element content (N, P, K, Ca, Na, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu), and some amino acids such as lysine, arginine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, and tyrosine in the seeds of broad beans”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1848–2110 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FeNPs ranked first, then chelated and sulfate iron, across tested measurements.

Taxon
Broad BeanVicia fabat0
Outcome
all tested measurementse0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum values of all tested measurements were observed when FeNPs were used as the foliar spraying followed by chelated and sulphate iron fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2140–2294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Broad Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑
t1

“Broad Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 109–119 · show in text ↑

sulfate · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

iron atom · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

iron atom · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

application · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 58 positive, 8 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 67 positive, 6 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 159 positive, 17 negative or no effect

158 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

application · physiology: water · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.