Paper · 2009 · Alexandria Science Exchange Journal

Response of Faba Bean to Foliar Spraying with Humic Substances and Micronutrients

R.E.; , Knany; Atia, R.H.; et al.

11
claims
37
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of humic substances, some micronutrients and their combination as foliar spraying on faba bean yield and seeds quality. Two field trials were carried out at Sakha Agric. Research Station Farm, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, during two successive seasons of 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 using faba bean variety Sakha 2. Split plot design was used with four replicates. The main plots were assigned with two humic substances treatments (i) without humic substances spraying, and (ii) spraying with humic substances at the rate of 300 mg L-1 of spraying solution in the suitable volume for the plant ages. The sub-plots were assigned with five treatments of (1) without spraying (check treatment), (2) spraying with copper at the rate of 100 mg Cu L-1 of spraying solution as copper sulphate, (3) spraying with zinc at the rate of 200 mg Zn L-1 of spraying solution as zinc sulphate, (4) spraying with iron at the rate of 300 mg Fe L-1 of spraying solution as ferrous sulphate, and (5) spraying with solution containing 100, 200 and 300 mg L-1 of Cu, Zn and Fe. The obtained results can be summarized as: Spraying with micronutrients significantly increased faba bean seeds yield in both seasons. Spraying with Fe produced the highest seeds yield of 3753.9 and 3772.0 kg ha-1 in the first and second seasons, respectively and increased 100 seeds weight, N% and P% in the seeds, N content kg ha-1, protein % in the seeds and available P in the soil after the harvesting. Spraying with Cu increased the biological yield in both seasons. Humic substances high significantly increased the seed yield by 20.8 and 22.9% in the first and second seasons, respectively, increased the biological yield in both seasons, 100 seeds weight, N%, P%, N content, protein % in the seeds, available N and available P in the soil after the harvesting. Humic substances increased the stimulating effects of micronutrients on all the studied parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying with micronutrients significantly increased faba bean seed yield in both seasons compared with no spraying.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Spraying with micronutrientse3
Outcome
seeds yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
without spraying (check treatment)e2
Setting
Sakha Agric. Research Station Farm, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effect of humic substances, some micronutrients and their combination as foliar spraying on faba bean yield and seeds quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two field trials were carried out at Sakha Agric. Research Station Farm, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, during two successive seasons of 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 using faba bean variety Sakha 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–374 · show in text ↑
e2

“(1) without spraying (check treatment)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–750 · show in text ↑
e3

“Spraying with micronutrients significantly increased faba bean seeds yield in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1159–1249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying with iron produced the highest faba bean seed yield, 3753.9 and 3772.0 kg/ha in the first and second seasons.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Spraying with Fee2
Outcome
seeds yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Value
3753.9 and 3772.0 kg ha-1e2
Setting
Sakha Agric. Research Station Farm, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effect of humic substances, some micronutrients and their combination as foliar spraying on faba bean yield and seeds quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Two field trials were carried out at Sakha Agric. Research Station Farm, Kafr El-Sheikh Governorate, Egypt, during two successive seasons of 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 using faba bean variety Sakha 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–374 · show in text ↑
e2

“Spraying with Fe produced the highest seeds yield of 3753.9 and 3772.0 kg ha-1 in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1375 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying with iron increased faba bean 100-seed weight, seed N% and seed P%.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Spraying with Fee1
Outcome
100 seeds weight, N% and P% in the seedse2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effect of humic substances, some micronutrients and their combination as foliar spraying on faba bean yield and seeds quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spraying with Fe produced the highest seeds yield of 3753.9 and 3772.0 kg ha-1 in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1375 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased 100 seeds weight, N% and P% in the seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1430 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying with iron increased seed N content, seed protein percentage and soil available P after harvest.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Spraying with Fee1
Outcome
N content kg ha-1, protein % in the seeds and available P in the soile3
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effect of humic substances, some micronutrients and their combination as foliar spraying on faba bean yield and seeds quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spraying with Fe produced the highest seeds yield of 3753.9 and 3772.0 kg ha-1 in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1375 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased 100 seeds weight, N% and P% in the seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1380–1430 · show in text ↑
e3

“N content kg ha-1, protein % in the seeds and available P in the soil after the harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1522 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying with copper increased faba bean biological yield in both seasons.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Spraying with Cue1
Outcome
biological yielde1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effect of humic substances, some micronutrients and their combination as foliar spraying on faba bean yield and seeds quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Spraying with Cu increased the biological yield in both seasons”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1524–1587 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic substances significantly increased faba bean seed yield by 20.8 and 22.9% in the first and second seasons.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Humic substancese1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
20.8 and 22.9%e1
Comparator
without humic substances sprayinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effect of humic substances, some micronutrients and their combination as foliar spraying on faba bean yield and seeds quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Humic substances high significantly increased the seed yield by 20.8 and 22.9% in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1713 · show in text ↑
e2

“(i) without humic substances spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic substances increased faba bean biological yield.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Humic substancese1
Outcome
biological yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
without humic substances sprayinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effect of humic substances, some micronutrients and their combination as foliar spraying on faba bean yield and seeds quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Humic substances high significantly increased the seed yield by 20.8 and 22.9% in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1713 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased the biological yield in both seasons, 100 seeds weight, N%, P%, N content, protein % in the seeds, available N and available P in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1863 · show in text ↑
e3

“(i) without humic substances spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic substances increased faba bean 100-seed weight, seed N% and seed P%.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Humic substancese1
Outcome
100 seeds weight, N%, P%e2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
without humic substances sprayinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effect of humic substances, some micronutrients and their combination as foliar spraying on faba bean yield and seeds quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Humic substances high significantly increased the seed yield by 20.8 and 22.9% in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1713 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased the biological yield in both seasons, 100 seeds weight, N%, P%, N content, protein % in the seeds, available N and available P in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1863 · show in text ↑
e3

“(i) without humic substances spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic substances increased seed N content and seed protein percentage in faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Humic substancese1
Outcome
N content, protein % in the seedse2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
without humic substances sprayinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effect of humic substances, some micronutrients and their combination as foliar spraying on faba bean yield and seeds quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Humic substances high significantly increased the seed yield by 20.8 and 22.9% in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1713 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased the biological yield in both seasons, 100 seeds weight, N%, P%, N content, protein % in the seeds, available N and available P in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1863 · show in text ↑
e3

“(i) without humic substances spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–528 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic substances increased available soil N and available soil P after harvest.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Humic substancese1
Outcome
available N and available P in the soile2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
without humic substances sprayinge3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effect of humic substances, some micronutrients and their combination as foliar spraying on faba bean yield and seeds quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Humic substances high significantly increased the seed yield by 20.8 and 22.9% in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1713 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased the biological yield in both seasons, 100 seeds weight, N%, P%, N content, protein % in the seeds, available N and available P in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1863 · show in text ↑
e3

“(i) without humic substances spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–528 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic substances increased the stimulating effects of micronutrients on all studied faba bean parameters.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Humic substancese1
Outcome
stimulating effects of micronutrients on all the studied parameterse1
Direction
increasede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effect of humic substances, some micronutrients and their combination as foliar spraying on faba bean yield and seeds quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–176 · show in text ↑
e1

“Humic substances increased the stimulating effects of micronutrients on all the studied parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1886–1984 · show in text ↑

iron atom · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results differ

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

copper atom · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

iron atom · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

micronutrient · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

other · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 28 positive, 2 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

other · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 32 positive, 7 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

application · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 110 positive, 6 negative or no effect

109 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.