Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Humic substances increased seed N content and seed protein percentage in faba bean.

A claim from Response of Faba Bean to Foliar Spraying with Humic Substances and Micronutrients · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic substances increased seed N content and seed protein percentage in faba bean.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Humic substancese1
Outcome
N content, protein % in the seedse2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
without humic substances sprayinge3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effect of humic substances, some micronutrients and their combination as foliar spraying on faba bean yield and seeds quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–176
e1

“Humic substances high significantly increased the seed yield by 20.8 and 22.9% in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1713
e2

“increased the biological yield in both seasons, 100 seeds weight, N%, P%, N content, protein % in the seeds, available N and available P in the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1715–1863
e3

“(i) without humic substances spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–528

Title

Response of Faba Bean to Foliar Spraying with Humic Substances and Micronutrients

R.E.; , Knany; Atia, R.H.; et al. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal 2009. doi:10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2009.3258

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-8dc4f83529b2dfdb548d6d02bb5ff3ffc75a99cf6e2f8ff158c137e35fecc3c7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

other · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.