Paper · 2016 · Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development /Fayoum Journal of Agricultural Research and Development

EFFECT OF FOLIAR MICRONUTRIENTS UNDER SOME BIOSTIMULANTS ON THE PRODUCTIVITY OF FABA BEAN (Vicia faba L.)

Ismail S. A.; Galal O. A. M.; Sarhan M. G. R

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two experimental trails were designed to quantify the response ofnodulation, growth and yield and its components of faba been plants as wellas nutrient content in seeds toward foliar spray twice of zinc (0.3% zincsulphate), iron (0.6% iron sulphate) and molybdenum (0.05% ammoniummolybdedate) under some bio-stimulants, i.e., inoculation with rhizobiumand 10 kg humic acid/feddan. The experiments were conducted at the Farmof Sids Agricultural Research Station (ARC), Beni Swif Governorate, Egyptduring two successive seasons (2013/2014 and 2014/2015). Number and dryweight of nodules/plant showed positive significant response to iron andmolybdenum applicationas well as rhizobia and humic acid treatmentscomparing with control. The maximum values of these parameters wereproduced in plots under the effect of molybdenum followed by ironapplication in combined with bio-stimulants. Plant height, dry weight/plant,number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod and grain and straw yields wererecorded under the treatments of spraying 0.6% iron sulphate in combinedwith rhizobia inoculation plus humic acid. Higher nitrogen or protein contentin seeds were produced under 0.3% zinc sulphate plus rhizobia inoculationplus humic acid, while, Fe and Mo application did not affect nitrogencontent. Zinc or molybdenum applications decreased phosphorus content inseeds, while, humic acid enhanced P content. Potassium content was affectedonly by humic acid. Zn application inhibited Fe content and vice versa ironapplication decreased zinc content in seeds. Added Zn, Fe, and Mo increasedtheir contents in seeds, respectively. Also, humic acid application improvedmacro and micronutrients in faba bean seeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron and molybdenum, rhizobia and humic acid increased nodule number and dry weight versus control.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
iron andmolybdenum applicationas well as rhizobia and humic acid treatmentse0
Outcome
Number and dryweight of nodules/plante0
Direction
positivee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Number and dryweight of nodules/plant showed positive significant response to iron andmolybdenum applicationas well as rhizobia and humic acid treatmentscomparing with control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–729 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molybdenum followed by iron with biostimulants produced maximal nodule measures.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
molybdenum followed by ironapplication in combined with bio-stimulantse0
Outcome
maximum values of these parameterse0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum values of these parameters wereproduced in plots under the effect of molybdenum followed by ironapplication in combined with bio-stimulants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–882 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron sulfate with rhizobia and humic acid produced the reported growth and yield traits.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
spraying 0.6% iron sulphate in combinedwith rhizobia inoculation plus humic acide0
Outcome
Plant height, dry weight/plant,number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod and grain and straw yieldse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, dry weight/plant,number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod and grain and straw yields wererecorded under the treatments of spraying 0.6% iron sulphate in combinedwith rhizobia inoculation plus humic acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc sulfate with rhizobia and humic acid yielded higher seed nitrogen or protein.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
0.3% zinc sulphate plus rhizobia inoculationplus humic acide0
Outcome
nitrogen or protein contentin seedse0
Direction
Highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher nitrogen or protein contentin seeds were produced under 0.3% zinc sulphate plus rhizobia inoculationplus humic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1224 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron and molybdenum did not affect seed nitrogen content.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
Fe and Mo applicatione0
Outcome
nitrogencontente0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fe and Mo application did not affect nitrogencontent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1233–1285 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc or molybdenum decreased seed phosphorus content.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
Zinc or molybdenum applicationse0
Outcome
phosphorus content inseedse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zinc or molybdenum applications decreased phosphorus content inseeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1287–1355 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid enhanced seed phosphorus content.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
humic acide0
Outcome
P contente0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“humic acid enhanced P content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1364–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only humic acid affected seed potassium content.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
humic acide0
Outcome
Potassium contente0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Potassium content was affectedonly by humic acid.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1444 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc application inhibited seed iron content.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
Zn applicatione0
Outcome
Fe contente0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Zn application inhibited Fe content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1445–1480 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Iron application decreased seed zinc content.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
ironapplicatione0
Outcome
zinc content in seedse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ironapplication decreased zinc content in seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1543 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied zinc, iron and molybdenum increased their respective seed contents.

Taxon
FABA BEANVicia fabat0
Treatment
Added Zn, Fe, and Moe0
Outcome
their contents in seedse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Added Zn, Fe, and Mo increasedtheir contents in seeds, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1545–1613 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid improved seed macro- and micronutrients.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
humic acid applicatione0
Outcome
macro and micronutrients in faba bean seedse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“humic acid application improvedmacro and micronutrients in faba bean seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1620–1694 · show in text ↑
t0

“FABA BEAN (Vicia faba L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 80–105 · show in text ↑

molybdenum atom · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

iron atom · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

zinc sulfate · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

other · molecular: metabolites · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

other · symbiosis · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

other · quality: protein · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.