Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Humic substances significantly increased faba bean seed yield by 20.8 and 22.9% in the first and second seasons.

A claim from Response of Faba Bean to Foliar Spraying with Humic Substances and Micronutrients · 2009

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic substances significantly increased faba bean seed yield by 20.8 and 22.9% in the first and second seasons.

Taxon
faba beanVicia fabae0
Treatment
Humic substancese1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
20.8 and 22.9%e1
Comparator
without humic substances sprayinge2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“investigate the effect of humic substances, some micronutrients and their combination as foliar spraying on faba bean yield and seeds quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–176
e1

“Humic substances high significantly increased the seed yield by 20.8 and 22.9% in the first and second seasons, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1589–1713
e2

“(i) without humic substances spraying”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 491–528

Title

Response of Faba Bean to Foliar Spraying with Humic Substances and Micronutrients

R.E.; , Knany; Atia, R.H.; et al. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal 2009. doi:10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2009.3258

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e8287718e8b97cbf3b71f9cec4ff992ffcff0680b79b7d1d6f2e24e33f283e3a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

other · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 32 positive, 7 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.