Paper · 2025 · Plants

Evaluating a Soil Amendment for Cadmium Mitigation and Enhanced Nutritional Quality in Faba Bean Genotypes: Implications for Food Safety

Liping Cheng; Jiapan Lian; Xin Wang; et al.

9
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Soil amendments combined with low cadmium (Cd)-accumulating crops are commonly used for remediating Cd contamination and ensuring food safety. However, the combined effects of soil amendments and the cultivation of faba beans (Vicia faba L.)—known for their high nutritional quality and low Cd accumulation—in moderately Cd-contaminated soils remain underexplored. This study investigates the impact of a soil amendment (SA) on agronomic traits, seed nutrition, and Cd accumulation in 11 faba bean genotypes grown in acidic soil (1.3 mg·kg−1 Cd, pH 5.39). The SA treatment increased soil pH to 6.0 (an 11.31% increase) and reduced DTPA-Cd by 37.1%. Although the average yield of faba beans decreased marginally by 8.74%, it remained within the 10% national permissible limit. Notably, SA treatment reduced Cd concentration in seeds by 60% and significantly mitigated Mn and Al toxicity. Additionally, SA treatment enhanced levels of essential macronutrients (Ca, Mg, P, S) and micronutrients (Mo, Cu) while lowering Phytate (Phy)/Ca, Phy/Mg, and Phy/P ratios, thus improving mineral nutrient bioavailability. Among the genotypes, F3, F5, and F6 showed the most favorable balance of nutrient quality, and yield following SA application. This study provides valuable insights into the effectiveness of SA for nutrient fortification and Cd contamination mitigation in Cd-contaminated farmland.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment raised soil pH to 6.0 by 11.31%.

Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
increasede0
Value
11.31%e0
Qualifier
6.0e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The SA treatment increased soil pH to 6.0 (an 11.31% increase) and reduced DTPA-Cd by 37.1%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment reduced DTPA-Cd by 37.1%.

Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
DTPA-Cde0
Direction
reducede0
Value
37.1%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The SA treatment increased soil pH to 6.0 (an 11.31% increase) and reduced DTPA-Cd by 37.1%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–648 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average faba bean yield decreased 8.74% after amendment.

Taxon
faba beansVicia fabae0
Treatment
Soil Amendmentt0
Outcome
average yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
8.74%e0
Qualifier
within the 10% national permissible limite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although the average yield of faba beans decreased marginally by 8.74%, it remained within the 10% national permissible limit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 649–775 · show in text ↑
t0

“Soil Amendment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–27 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment reduced seed Cd concentration by 60%.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Organ / stage
seedse0
Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
Cd concentration in seedse0
Direction
reducede0
Value
60%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA treatment reduced Cd concentration in seeds by 60% and significantly mitigated Mn and Al toxicity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendment significantly mitigated Mn and Al toxicity.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
Mn and Al toxicitye0
Direction
mitigatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA treatment reduced Cd concentration in seeds by 60% and significantly mitigated Mn and Al toxicity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–886 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendment raised Ca, Mg and P levels.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
levels of essential macronutrients (Ca, Mg, P, S)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA treatment enhanced levels of essential macronutrients (Ca, Mg, P, S) and micronutrients (Mo, Cu) while lowering Phytate (Phy)/Ca, Phy/Mg, and Phy/P ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendment raised Mo and Cu levels.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
micronutrients (Mo, Cu)e0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA treatment enhanced levels of essential macronutrients (Ca, Mg, P, S) and micronutrients (Mo, Cu) while lowering Phytate (Phy)/Ca, Phy/Mg, and Phy/P ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amendment lowered phytate to mineral ratios.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Treatment
SA treatmente0
Outcome
Phytate (Phy)/Ca, Phy/Mg, and Phy/P ratiose0
Direction
loweringe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SA treatment enhanced levels of essential macronutrients (Ca, Mg, P, S) and micronutrients (Mo, Cu) while lowering Phytate (Phy)/Ca, Phy/Mg, and Phy/P ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Genotypes F3, F5 and F6 had the most favorable nutrient-quality and yield balance after amendment.

Taxon
Faba BeanVicia fabat0
Material
F3, F5, and F6e0
Treatment
SA applicatione0
Outcome
balance of nutrient quality, and yielde0
Direction
most favorablee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vicia faba
Vicia faba · TaxonRahmaziz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the genotypes, F3, F5, and F6 showed the most favorable balance of nutrient quality, and yield following SA application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1235 · show in text ↑
t0

“Faba Bean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 · show in text ↑

salicylic acid · molecular: metabolites · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salicylic acid · pest · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

salicylic acid · nutrient: content · Vicia faba (faba bean)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

other · yield · Vicia faba (faba bean)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 32 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 32 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.